Automotive Supplier · Michigan

Lear Corporation - Rochester Hills (2)

Rochester Hills, MI · ~158 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
9.0
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lear Corporation - Rochester Hills (2) runs at 166% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Automotive Supplier workplace, earning a grade D.

Lear Corporation - Rochester Hills (2): 9.0 TCR = 166% of Automotive Supplier BLS 5.4 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lear Corporation - Rochester Hills (2) safety composite

Lear Corporation - Rochester Hills (2) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.4

2016→2020

Lear Corporation - Rochester Hills (2) injury rate improved

Lear Corporation - Rochester Hills (2)'s TCR fell 11.4 from 11.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 17.2 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.4 · 2018=17.2 · 2019=7.2 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336360 · Rochester Hills, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 9.0 · 166% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #95/100
  • PHOTO Autoneum North Ameri…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 67 inj
  • SIZE ~158 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Autoneum North America Spartan 1 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Lear Corporation - Rochester Hills (2) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lear Corporation - Rochester Hills (2) averages 9.0 TCR (166% of the Automotive Supplier BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lear Corporation - Rochester Hills (2) TCR series: 2016=11.4 · 2018=17.2 · 2019=7.2 · 2020=0 · BLS 5.4

Where Lear Corporation - Rochester Hills (2) falls in its industry

384 Automotive Supplier establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #95 safest of 100 Automotive Supplier employers in Michigan.

Lear Corporation - Rochester Hills (2) (158 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 245 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Lear Corporation - Rochester Hills (2)
Lear Corporation - Rochester Hills (2) (158 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 245 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Lear Corporation - Rochester Hills (2) has fewer employees than the Automotive Supplier median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 7.2 7.2 7 0 0
2018 17.2 14.4 35 2 0
2016 11.4 9.9 25 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336360 · MI · Rochester Hills

384 Automotive Supplier employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 107 employers in Rochester Hills, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Autoneum North America Spartan 1 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Auria St. Clair 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR September Ends Co 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR UGN-Monroe 8.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Merlo Construction Company, Inc. 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE PLYMOUTH, MI 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barrette Outdoor Living 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midwest Glass Fabrictors 158 FTE
CITY-NEAR FANUC America Corporation - Rochester Hills 1,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henry Ford- Rochester Hills Data Center 409 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rochester Hills Data Center 396 FTE
CITY-NEAR InfuSystem, Inc. - Headquarters 367 FTE
NAT-TCR Ross store 634 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 0000000098 Quick Chek Food Stores 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Area Recycling, Inc. 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Scantibodies Biologics 9.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sherman Brothers Trucking 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE Union Tank Car Company - Valdosta, GA 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE True Value Atlanta RDC 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE NFS:NFPG1 - NFPG1-Corp Office-Pleasant Gro 158 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.