Warehousing and storage, general merchandise · Georgia

True Value Atlanta RDC

Jonesboro, GA · ~158 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

True Value Atlanta RDC runs at 96% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Warehousing and storage, general merchandise workplace, earning a grade C.

True Value Atlanta RDC: 5.6 TCR = 96% of Warehousing and storage, general merchandise BLS 5.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

True Value Atlanta RDC safety composite

True Value Atlanta RDC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2016→2020

True Value Atlanta RDC injury rate improved

True Value Atlanta RDC's TCR fell 2.4 from 7.0 in 2016 to 4.6 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.3 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.0 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=7.3 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=4.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Jonesboro, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 5.6 · 96% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #414/506
  • PHOTO Amazon.com Services …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 44 inj
  • SIZE ~158 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Amazon.com Services LLC - PHL7 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

True Value Atlanta RDC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows True Value Atlanta RDC averages 5.6 TCR (96% of the Warehousing and storage, general merchandise BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

True Value Atlanta RDC TCR series: 2016=7 · 2017=4.5 · 2018=7.3 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=4.6 · BLS 5.8

Where True Value Atlanta RDC falls in its industry

9,477 Warehousing and storage, gener establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #414 safest of 506 Warehousing and storage, gener employers in Georgia.

True Value Atlanta RDC (158 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate True Value Atlanta RDC
True Value Atlanta RDC (158 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

True Value Atlanta RDC has more employees than the Warehousing and storage, general merchan median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 4.6 4.0 8 0 0
2019 4.5 3.8 7 0 0
2018 7.3 5.5 12 0 0
2017 4.5 2.5 7 0 0
2016 7.0 4.2 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · GA · Jonesboro

9,477 Warehousing and storage, general merchandise employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 38 employers in Jonesboro, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - PHL7 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6933 MDV COLUMBUS (GA) 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clifton DC 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 30015-CAPSTONE AWG SPRINGFIELD MO 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Baker Constructors, Inc. Georgia Division 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cargill, Incorporated-Gainesville Plant 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE Profile Custom Extrusions 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE ASI-900 Facility 158 FTE
CITY-NEAR BHW Sheet Metal 180 FTE
CITY-NEAR True Value Company RDC - Atlanta 167 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jonesboro Nursing and Rehabilitation Center LLC 154 FTE
CITY-NEAR LTI, Inc. 151 FTE
NAT-TCR Fern Terrace of Murray, LLC 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Select Specialty Hospital - Columbus, Inc. 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Mt. Vernon City Schools, District #80 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Ross store 585 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lear Corporation - Rochester Hills (2) 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sherman Brothers Trucking 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE NFS:NFPG1 - NFPG1-Corp Office-Pleasant Gro 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE 242 Mason Avenue 158 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.