Cruise control mechanisms, electronic, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing · Michigan

Lear Corporation - Taylor

Taylor, MI · ~103 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.1
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lear Corporation - Taylor runs at 150% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Cruise control mechanisms, electronic, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Lear Corporation - Taylor: 8.1 TCR = 150% of Cruise control mechanisms, electronic, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lear Corporation - Taylor safety composite

Lear Corporation - Taylor scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Lear Corporation - Taylor: 6.9 → 11.9 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 11.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.28× in 2019

Lear Corporation - Taylor's TCR rose 5.0 from 6.9 in 2016 to 11.9 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 1.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336320 · Taylor, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 8.1 · 150% of ind

  • DART 10.4 DART
  • RANK #36/36
  • PHOTO Valeo Bessemer Site
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~103 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Valeo Bessemer Site (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Lear Corporation - Taylor in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lear Corporation - Taylor averages 8.1 TCR (150% of the Cruise control mechanisms, electronic, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lear Corporation - Taylor TCR series: 2016=6.9 · 2018=5.6 · 2019=11.9 · BLS 5.4

Where Lear Corporation - Taylor falls in its industry

216 Cruise control mechanisms, ele establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 36 Cruise control mechanisms, ele employers in Michigan.

Lear Corporation - Taylor (103 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 162 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Lear Corporation - Taylor
Lear Corporation - Taylor (103 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 162 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Lear Corporation - Taylor has fewer employees than the Cruise control mechanisms, electronic, a median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 11.9 10.4 7 1 0
2018 5.6 2.2 5 0 0
2016 6.9 6.0 3 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336320 · MI · Taylor

216 Cruise control mechanisms, electronic, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 116 employers in Taylor, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Valeo Bessemer Site 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brose Spartanburg 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Montgomery AL USA Plant 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR APTIV Services US, LLC (Plant 10) 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE MKG Norton Shores SC 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henkels & McCoy - Canton, MI - Verizon 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE VanLaan Concrete Construction 103 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bumler Mechanical 103 FTE
CITY-NEAR Detroit 1,670 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2250-5 1,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR Team Solutions Corporate US 528 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2912 435 FTE
NAT-TCR 192 ABC Supply Co., Inc 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Greenwich (HR) 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Orlando - Convention Center (HP) 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Burlington - 080 8.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sierra Recycling and Demolition 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE QSI-Carthage 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dallas Fort Worth Int. Airport 103 FTE
NAT-SIZE Standard Precast Inc 103 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.