Power window and door lock systems, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing · Alabama

Montgomery AL USA Plant

Montgomery, AL · ~115 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Montgomery AL USA Plant runs at 122% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Power window and door lock systems, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Montgomery AL USA Plant: 6.6 TCR = 122% of Power window and door lock systems, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Montgomery AL USA Plant safety composite

Montgomery AL USA Plant scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2016→2018

Montgomery AL USA Plant injury rate improved

Montgomery AL USA Plant's TCR fell 0.6 from 6.9 in 2016 to 6.3 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.9 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.68× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.9 · 2017=6.7 · 2018=6.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336320 · Montgomery, AL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.6 · 122% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #13/14
  • PHOTO APTIV Services US, L…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~115 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: APTIV Services US, LLC (Plant 10) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Montgomery AL USA Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Montgomery AL USA Plant averages 6.6 TCR (122% of the Power window and door lock systems, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Montgomery AL USA Plant TCR series: 2016=6.9 · 2017=6.7 · 2018=6.3 · BLS 5.4

Where Montgomery AL USA Plant falls in its industry

216 Power window and door lock sys establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 14 Power window and door lock sys employers in Alabama.

Montgomery AL USA Plant (115 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 162 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Montgomery AL USA Plant
Montgomery AL USA Plant (115 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 162 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Montgomery AL USA Plant has fewer employees than the Power window and door lock systems, auto median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 6.3 4.5 7 0 0
2017 6.7 5.8 8 0 0
2016 6.9 5.2 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336320 · AL · Montgomery

216 Power window and door lock systems, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 420 employers in Montgomery, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR APTIV Services US, LLC (Plant 10) 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wise Harness Solutions 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR KD-Lamp Company 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3383 Northern Lights 6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE 104041 - Project Yellowhammer 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE Homtex - Cullman 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0264 - Int. Doors-Ozark 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE Axis, AL site 115 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama, LLC 3,611 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Medical Center South 2,392 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jackson Hospital & Clinic 2,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR Montgomery 1,561 FTE
NAT-TCR Arbon Steel & Service Company 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 2 - Terminal 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Tampa Facility 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Tmx2205 - Marietta 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Western State Colorado Univers 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE MSY - Airport United Airlines Offices 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Salt-Watkins Glen 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE TutorPerini Building Corp Florida 115 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.