Calendering textile products, apparel, and fabrics · Pennsylvania

Lear Guilford - Pine Grove PD

Pine Grove, PA · ~209 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lear Guilford - Pine Grove PD runs at 89% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Calendering textile products, apparel, and fabrics workplace, earning a grade C.

Lear Guilford - Pine Grove PD: 3.0 TCR = 89% of Calendering textile products, apparel, and fabrics BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lear Guilford - Pine Grove PD safety composite

Lear Guilford - Pine Grove PD scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2016→2019

Lear Guilford - Pine Grove PD injury rate improved

Lear Guilford - Pine Grove PD's TCR fell 2.5 from 4.7 in 2016 to 2.2 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.7 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.7 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 313310 · Pine Grove, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 89% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #5/17
  • PHOTO DAVLYN MANUFACTURING
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~209 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DAVLYN MANUFACTURING (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Lear Guilford - Pine Grove PD in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lear Guilford - Pine Grove PD averages 3.0 TCR (89% of the Calendering textile products, apparel, and fabrics BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lear Guilford - Pine Grove PD TCR series: 2016=4.7 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=2.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Lear Guilford - Pine Grove PD falls in its industry

166 Calendering textile products, establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 17 Calendering textile products, employers in Pennsylvania.

Lear Guilford - Pine Grove PD (209 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 78 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Lear Guilford - Pine Grove PD
Lear Guilford - Pine Grove PD (209 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 78 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Lear Guilford - Pine Grove PD has more employees than the Calendering textile products, apparel, a median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.2 1.3 5 0 0
2018 1.9 0.4 5 0 0
2016 4.7 1.9 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

313310 · PA · Pine Grove

166 Calendering textile products, apparel, and fabrics employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 13 employers in Pine Grove, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DAVLYN MANUFACTURING 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gemini Industries 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR UTT 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Flint St. Plant 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Seneca Resources Company, LLC East 209 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hranec Sheet Metal 209 FTE
STATE-SIZE B.R. Kreider & Son, Inc. 209 FTE
STATE-SIZE Whirley Industries - Harmar Facility 209 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lear Guilford - Pine Grove (WA) 195 FTE
CITY-NEAR BG's Value Market 190 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pleasant Valley Homes, Inc. 185 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lear Guilford - Pine Grove (PD) 175 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Johnston-Willis Hospital 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cactus Feeders 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Northwest New Mexico 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Modern Railway Systems - Charlotte LYNX 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE DNC Parks & Resorts at Shenandoah, Inc. 209 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maumee Assembly and Stamping 209 FTE
NAT-SIZE WA-Boeing (Everett) 209 FTE
NAT-SIZE Community Home Health Network of Indiana 20-5280817 209 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.