Maintenance and repair services, aircraft (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) · Florida

Learjet Inc. Opa Locka

Opa Locka, FL · ~212 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Learjet Inc. Opa Locka runs at 46% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Maintenance and repair services, aircraft (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) workplace, earning a grade A.

Learjet Inc. Opa Locka: 2.0 TCR = 46% of Maintenance and repair services, aircraft (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Learjet Inc. Opa Locka safety composite

Learjet Inc. Opa Locka scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Learjet Inc. Opa Locka: 1.5 → 2.6 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 2.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.62× in 2024

Learjet Inc. Opa Locka's TCR rose 1.0 from 1.5 in 2023 to 2.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Opa Locka, FL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.0 · 46% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #60/137
  • PHOTO Naples Jet Center Ho…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~212 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Naples Jet Center Holdings (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Learjet Inc. Opa Locka in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Learjet Inc. Opa Locka averages 2.0 TCR (46% of the Maintenance and repair services, aircraft (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Learjet Inc. Opa Locka TCR series: 2023=1.5 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 4.5

Where Learjet Inc. Opa Locka falls in its industry

992 Maintenance and repair service establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #60 safest of 137 Maintenance and repair service employers in Florida.

Learjet Inc. Opa Locka (212 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Learjet Inc. Opa Locka
Learjet Inc. Opa Locka (212 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Learjet Inc. Opa Locka has more employees than the Maintenance and repair services, aircraf median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 1.3 6 0 0
2023 1.5 1.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · FL · Opa Locka

992 Maintenance and repair services, aircraft (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 27 employers in Opa Locka, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Naples Jet Center Holdings 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SRQ-FFM 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR North State Aviation 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 9123-SJC-PRIME APPEARANCE 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE G&D Farms Inc 212 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alpha Foliage, Inc 212 FTE
STATE-SIZE FHS / Mazzella Hoist & Crane Service 212 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flowers Baking Co. of Lakeland, Inc. 212 FTE
CITY-NEAR ROYAL PALM_1449534 1,238 FTE
CITY-NEAR 116812-ROYAL PALM FL P&DC 1,078 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - MIA2 396 FTE
CITY-NEAR Invincible Boat 298 FTE
NAT-TCR Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR TMX2142 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Lear Corporation - Detroit Conner 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant Eagle #1842 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 10568 Edgewater Chicago 212 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hanover Park Il - 3253 212 FTE
NAT-SIZE 256-PL002 212 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon Retail LLC - MAE4 212 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.