Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Florida

Calusa Harbour

Fort Myers, FL · ~212 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Calusa Harbour runs at 413% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Calusa Harbour: 15.7 TCR = 413% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Calusa Harbour safety composite

Calusa Harbour scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.1

2017→2023

Calusa Harbour injury rate improved

Calusa Harbour's TCR fell 7.1 from 8.7 in 2017 to 1.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 48.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.7 · 2018=5.2 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=48.8 · 2021=23.7 · 2022=15.9 · 2023=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Fort Myers, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 15.7 · 413% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #365/396
  • PHOTO PSL-Castlewoods Place
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 61 inj
  • SIZE ~212 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PSL-Castlewoods Place (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Calusa Harbour in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Calusa Harbour averages 15.7 TCR (413% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Calusa Harbour TCR series: 2017=8.7 · 2018=5.2 · 2019=5.7 · 2020=48.8 · 2021=23.7 · 2022=15.9 · 2023=1.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Calusa Harbour falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #365 safest of 396 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Florida.

Calusa Harbour (212 employees, TCR 15.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Calusa Harbour
Calusa Harbour (212 employees, TCR 15.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Calusa Harbour has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.7 0.0 1 0 0
2022 15.9 9.5 7 3 0
2021 23.7 21.4 10 22 0
2020 48.8 48.3 4 92 0
2019 5.7 3.8 11 1 0
2018 5.2 2.9 11 0 0
2017 8.7 6.4 17 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · FL · Fort Myers

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 484 employers in Fort Myers, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PSL-Castlewoods Place 15.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Highland Estates 15.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cedar Lake Village 15.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Willow Towers 15.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE G&D Farms Inc 212 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alpha Foliage, Inc 212 FTE
STATE-SIZE FHS / Mazzella Hoist & Crane Service 212 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flowers Baking Co. of Lakeland, Inc. 212 FTE
CITY-NEAR CCI-DANIELS LLC 2,935 FTE
CITY-NEAR Home Health Ft Myers 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shell Point Retirement Communty 1,071 FTE
CITY-NEAR Christian & Missionary Alliance Foundation, inc. 1,014 FTE
NAT-TCR IRRF 15.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Sewer 15.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0019-0019-01687 15.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 186885-Oskaloosa Po 15.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Color-Art Palette Inc 212 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Meyers Printing 212 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holden Rehabilitation & Skilled Nursing Center 212 FTE
NAT-SIZE Applewood Estates 212 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.