Commercial building construction general contractors · Oregon

Lease Crutcher Lewis - Portland

Portland, OR · ~211 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lease Crutcher Lewis - Portland runs at 98% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Commercial building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

Lease Crutcher Lewis - Portland: 2.8 TCR = 98% of Commercial building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lease Crutcher Lewis - Portland safety composite

Lease Crutcher Lewis - Portland scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2017→2023

Lease Crutcher Lewis - Portland injury rate improved

Lease Crutcher Lewis - Portland's TCR fell 1.9 from 5.0 in 2017 to 3.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.77× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.0 · 2022=0.5 · 2023=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Portland, OR AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 98% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #40/95
  • PHOTO Penn State Foundatio…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~211 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Penn State Foundation Services, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Lease Crutcher Lewis - Portland in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lease Crutcher Lewis - Portland averages 2.8 TCR (98% of the Commercial building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lease Crutcher Lewis - Portland TCR series: 2017=5 · 2022=0.5 · 2023=3.1 · BLS 2.9

Where Lease Crutcher Lewis - Portland falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #40 safest of 95 Commercial building constructi employers in Oregon.

Lease Crutcher Lewis - Portland (211 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Lease Crutcher Lewis - Portland
Lease Crutcher Lewis - Portland (211 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Lease Crutcher Lewis - Portland has more employees than the Commercial building construction general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.1 2.2 7 0 0
2022 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2017 5.0 5.0 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · OR · Portland

4,692 Commercial building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 1,728 employers in Portland, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Penn State Foundation Services, LLC 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rice Companies Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR CD Smith Construction - UW Madison Vet Med 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR E. F. Brett & Company Inc. 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE K&E Excavating, Inc. 211 FTE
STATE-SIZE Duraflake Particleboard 211 FTE
STATE-SIZE Endura Products, Inc.-Prineville 211 FTE
STATE-SIZE JAE Oregon 211 FTE
CITY-NEAR OHSU Main Campus 18,003 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR349 PROVIDENCE ST VINCENT MEDICAL CTR-PORTLA 4,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR346 PROVIDENCE PORTLAND MEDICAL CTR-PORTLAND 3,684 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000530 3,498 FTE
NAT-TCR Alpine Demolition Services, LLC 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Hatchery (Talladega) 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Cardinal Health St Charles MO PD 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Owosso Graphic Arts, Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Custom Air Products and Services Inc. 211 FTE
NAT-SIZE Proconex Corporate 211 FTE
NAT-SIZE NEA 211 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mikros Engineering 211 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.