Retirement communities, continuing care · New York

Legacy at Park Crescent

Greece, NY · ~47 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Legacy at Park Crescent runs at 339% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Retirement communities, continuing care workplace, earning a grade F.

Legacy at Park Crescent: 12.9 TCR = 339% of Retirement communities, continuing care BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Legacy at Park Crescent safety composite

Legacy at Park Crescent scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2016→2023

Legacy at Park Crescent injury rate improved

Legacy at Park Crescent's TCR fell 0.9 from 9.1 in 2016 to 8.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 26.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.1 · 2017=26.5 · 2018=14.0 · 2019=19.8 · 2020=10.4 · 2021=11.3 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=8.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Greece, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.9 · 339% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #89/98
  • PHOTO Willow Gardens
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Willow Gardens (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Legacy at Park Crescent in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Legacy at Park Crescent averages 12.9 TCR (339% of the Retirement communities, continuing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Legacy at Park Crescent TCR series: 2016=9.1 · 2017=26.5 · 2018=14 · 2019=19.8 · 2020=10.4 · 2021=11.3 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=8.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Legacy at Park Crescent falls in its industry

4,127 Retirement communities, contin establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #89 safest of 98 Retirement communities, contin employers in New York.

Legacy at Park Crescent (47 employees, TCR 12.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Legacy at Park Crescent
Legacy at Park Crescent (47 employees, TCR 12.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Legacy at Park Crescent has fewer employees than the Retirement communities, continuing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 8.3 4.2 2 0 0
2022 3.5 0.0 1 0 0
2021 11.3 7.6 2 1 0
2020 10.4 3.5 3 0 0
2019 19.8 17.0 7 0 0
2018 14.0 7.0 4 0 0
2017 26.5 26.5 3 0 0
2016 9.1 6.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · NY · Greece

4,127 Retirement communities, continuing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 27 employers in Greece, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Willow Gardens 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bickford of Lincoln 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR South Bend Retirement LLC dba Primrose of Mishawaka 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Arbors at Dracut 12.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE CSS Farms, LLC Bliss, NY 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brightly Farms, LLC 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Red Jacket Orchards 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barbland Dairy LLC 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5282 332 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5282 288 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DRO2 259 FTE
CITY-NEAR Unit # 2490 178 FTE
NAT-TCR Hickes Associates, Inc. 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Laureate Chicago Operations, LLC 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Levering Regional Health Care Center 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Solaris Senior Living Stuart 12.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Miller Street Complex 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE BDL Hartford Bradley International Airport 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Energy CSC 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Massey's Plate Glass and Aluminum Shop 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.