Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Florida

Solaris Senior Living Stuart

Stuart, FL · ~50 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Solaris Senior Living Stuart runs at 339% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Solaris Senior Living Stuart: 12.9 TCR = 339% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Solaris Senior Living Stuart safety composite

Solaris Senior Living Stuart scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−22.4

2019→2022

Solaris Senior Living Stuart injury rate improved

Solaris Senior Living Stuart's TCR fell 22.4 from 27.6 in 2019 to 5.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 27.6 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=27.6 · 2021=5.8 · 2022=5.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Stuart, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.9 · 339% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #335/396
  • PHOTO Brookdale Hamilton
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale Hamilton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Solaris Senior Living Stuart in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Solaris Senior Living Stuart averages 12.9 TCR (339% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Solaris Senior Living Stuart TCR series: 2019=27.6 · 2021=5.8 · 2022=5.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Solaris Senior Living Stuart falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #335 safest of 396 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Florida.

Solaris Senior Living Stuart (50 employees, TCR 12.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Solaris Senior Living Stuart
Solaris Senior Living Stuart (50 employees, TCR 12.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Solaris Senior Living Stuart has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 5.2 0.0 2 0 0
2021 5.8 0.0 2 0 0
2019 27.6 11.8 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · FL · Stuart

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 138 employers in Stuart, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Hamilton 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kinship Pointe at McCook 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Falls River Court 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR KRE-BSL HUSKY PLYMOUTH OPERATION LLC 12.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bushnell 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cal-Maine foods Lake City 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE M & M Packing LLC 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Walton Service Center 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2160 SE Ocean Blvd Bldg. 2 (Thrift Shop) (TCH5) 4,949 FTE
CITY-NEAR Martin Memorial Health Systems Inc 4,568 FTE
CITY-NEAR CC MARTIN HEALTH 1,836 FTE
CITY-NEAR NuCO2, LLC 1,136 FTE
NAT-TCR Levering Regional Health Care Center 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 357123-Roc-Gmf Carrier Unit 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Laureate Chicago Operations, LLC 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 050258-Antioch Po 12.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Peak Fall Protection 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4x4 Concrete Forming, Inc. 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ace Elastomer 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE ITW Powertrain Plastics NA 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.