Cabinets (i.e., housings), wood (e.g., sewing machines, stereo, television), manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Legacy Building Products

Mifflinburg, PA · ~83 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Legacy Building Products runs at 111% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Cabinets (i.e., housings), wood (e.g., sewing machines, stereo, television), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Legacy Building Products: 3.6 TCR = 111% of Cabinets (i.e., housings), wood (e.g., sewing machines, stereo, television), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Legacy Building Products safety composite

Legacy Building Products scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.5

2020→2024

Legacy Building Products injury rate improved

Legacy Building Products's TCR fell 4.5 from 6.8 in 2020 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=6.8 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321999 · Mifflinburg, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.6 · 111% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/15
  • PHOTO Kings Mountain Plant
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~83 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kings Mountain Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Legacy Building Products in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Legacy Building Products averages 3.6 TCR (111% of the Cabinets (i.e., housings), wood (e.g., sewing machines, stereo, television), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Legacy Building Products TCR series: 2020=6.8 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Legacy Building Products falls in its industry

405 Cabinets (i.e., housings), woo establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 15 Cabinets (i.e., housings), woo employers in Pennsylvania.

Legacy Building Products (83 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Legacy Building Products
Legacy Building Products (83 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Legacy Building Products has more employees than the Cabinets (i.e., housings), wood (e.g., s median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 0.0 2 0 0
2023 2.3 2.3 2 0 0
2022 4.2 4.2 4 0 0
2021 2.6 2.6 2 0 0
2020 6.8 5.1 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321999 · PA · Mifflinburg

405 Cabinets (i.e., housings), wood (e.g., sewing machines, stereo, television), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 11 employers in Mifflinburg, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kings Mountain Plant 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Epicurean Cutting Surfaces LLC 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cherryville Plant 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hazlehurst Wood Pellets, LLC 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE MD Basciani & Sons, Inc. 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Hillis Group, pLLC 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henkels & McCoy, Inc - Ford City 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ritz-Craft Corporation of Pennsylvania 353 FTE
CITY-NEAR RITZ-CRAFT CORP of PA 293 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cabinetworks Group 280 FTE
CITY-NEAR Elkay Wood Products Company - Mifflinburg 206 FTE
NAT-TCR North Park Transportation 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR EventLink, LLC 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Alpha Insulation Houston 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Aptar - Mukwonago 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Oak Park Care Center 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Extrusions, Inc 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ridgmar Medical Lodge 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE King Kullen #51 83 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.