Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) · Louisiana

Legacy Logistical Solutions

Mandeville, LA · ~115 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Legacy Logistical Solutions runs at 163% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) workplace, earning a grade D.

Legacy Logistical Solutions: 7.3 TCR = 163% of Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Legacy Logistical Solutions safety composite

Legacy Logistical Solutions scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 7.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
C 7.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Legacy Logistical Solutions held a steady TCR band

Legacy Logistical Solutions's TCR held near 0.0 from 7.4 in 2022 to 7.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 7.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=7.4 · 2023=7.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492210 · Mandeville, LA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.3 · 163% of ind

  • DART 7.3 DART
  • RANK #6/14
  • PHOTO 6458-ZGFP
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~115 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 6458-ZGFP (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

Legacy Logistical Solutions in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Legacy Logistical Solutions averages 7.3 TCR (163% of the Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Legacy Logistical Solutions TCR series: 2022=7.4 · 2023=7.3 · BLS 4.5

Where Legacy Logistical Solutions falls in its industry

1,452 Delivery service (except as pa establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 11.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 14 Delivery service (except as pa employers in Louisiana.

Legacy Logistical Solutions (115 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 11.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Legacy Logistical Solutions
Legacy Logistical Solutions (115 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 11.8

Legacy Logistical Solutions has more employees than the Delivery service (except as part of inte median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 11.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 7.3 7.3 10 0 0
2022 7.4 7.4 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492210 · LA · Mandeville

1,452 Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 60 employers in Mandeville, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 6458-ZGFP 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aero Logistics & Transportation Inc. 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR A&C LOGISTICS LLC 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Always More Logistics 7.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Entergy Algiers Gretna 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE 8144-IP Mansfield 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE Performance Contractors, Inc. - Marathon 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE Manson Gulf LLC 115 FTE
CITY-NEAR C-Innovation, LLC 322 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pontchartain Healthcare Centre 198 FTE
CITY-NEAR Max Foote Construction, LLC 184 FTE
CITY-NEAR Command Construction Industries 181 FTE
NAT-TCR Blue Mountain Warehouse 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Mountain States Const. Co. 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Newton Village 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Dean & Allyn, Inc. 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Main 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kuehne + Nagel Inc. (LJV2-6405) 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Skilled Manufacturing - Automotive Division 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE BrandSafway Services, LLC - Los Angeles Branch 115 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.