General warehousing and storage · Texas

Legacy Supply Chain Services - LG NTX Facility

Fort Worth, TX · ~242 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Legacy Supply Chain Services - LG NTX Facility runs at 21% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

Legacy Supply Chain Services - LG NTX Facility: 1.2 TCR = 21% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Legacy Supply Chain Services - LG NTX Facility safety composite

Legacy Supply Chain Services - LG NTX Facility scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2017→2018

Legacy Supply Chain Services - LG NTX Facility injury rate improved

Legacy Supply Chain Services - LG NTX Facility's TCR fell 1.1 from 1.8 in 2017 to 0.6 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.8 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.8 · 2018=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Fort Worth, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 21% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #152/846
  • PHOTO WM 6003
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~242 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WM 6003 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Legacy Supply Chain Services - LG NTX Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Legacy Supply Chain Services - LG NTX Facility averages 1.2 TCR (21% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Legacy Supply Chain Services - LG NTX Facility TCR series: 2017=1.8 · 2018=0.6 · BLS 5.8

Where Legacy Supply Chain Services - LG NTX Facility falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #152 safest of 846 General warehousing and storag employers in Texas.

Legacy Supply Chain Services - LG NTX Facility (242 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Legacy Supply Chain Services - LG NTX Facility
Legacy Supply Chain Services - LG NTX Facility (242 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Legacy Supply Chain Services - LG NTX Facility has more employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.6 0.3 2 0 0
2017 1.8 1.4 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · TX · Fort Worth

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,346 employers in Fort Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WM 6003 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Taylored Services LLC - Ontario 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ryder System, Inc. 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR XGrass LLC 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE QNT - Midlothian 242 FTE
STATE-SIZE Warm Springs Rehabilitation Hospital of Kyle 242 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clayton Homes 952 242 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 2769 242 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Lockheed Blvd (1093) 16,547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Fort Worth Campus (1093) 13,805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Children's Medical Center 4,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX- Fort Worth 4,667 FTE
NAT-TCR Stone Mountain, Georgia Container Graphics Corporation 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Juneau 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR HCS 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Public Market - Charlotte, NC 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mia Hub 242 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midway Windows and Doors Inc. 242 FTE
NAT-SIZE NCVM 242 FTE
NAT-SIZE Neenah Paper Whiting 242 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.