Physical rehabilitation hospitals · Texas

Warm Springs Rehabilitation Hospital of Kyle

Kyle, TX · ~242 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Warm Springs Rehabilitation Hospital of Kyle runs at 366% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Physical rehabilitation hospitals workplace, earning a grade F.

Warm Springs Rehabilitation Hospital of Kyle: 13.9 TCR = 366% of Physical rehabilitation hospitals BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Warm Springs Rehabilitation Hospital of Kyle safety composite

Warm Springs Rehabilitation Hospital of Kyle scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 21.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3797.9

2016→2018

Warm Springs Rehabilitation Hospital of Kyle injury rate improved

Warm Springs Rehabilitation Hospital of Kyle's TCR fell 3797.9 from 3823.2 in 2016 to 25.3 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3823.2 TCR. In 2018, DART was 1.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3823.2 · 2017=2.5 · 2018=25.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622310 · Kyle, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 13.9 · 366% of ind

  • DART 21.9 DART
  • RANK #216/221
  • PHOTO Encompass Health Reh…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~242 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Spring Hill (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Warm Springs Rehabilitation Hospital of Kyle in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Warm Springs Rehabilitation Hospital of Kyle averages 13.9 TCR (366% of the Physical rehabilitation hospitals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Warm Springs Rehabilitation Hospital of Kyle TCR series: 2016=3823.2 · 2017=2.5 · 2018=25.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Warm Springs Rehabilitation Hospital of Kyle falls in its industry

1,390 Physical rehabilitation hospit establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #216 safest of 221 Physical rehabilitation hospit employers in Texas.

Warm Springs Rehabilitation Hospital of Kyle (242 employees, TCR 13.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 5.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Warm Springs Rehabilitation Hospital of Kyle
Warm Springs Rehabilitation Hospital of Kyle (242 employees, TCR 13.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 5.4

Warm Springs Rehabilitation Hospital of Kyle has more employees than the Physical rehabilitation hospitals median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 25.3 21.9 15 0 0
2017 2.5 1.7 3 0 0
2016 3823.2 3106.3 16 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622310 · TX · Kyle

1,390 Physical rehabilitation hospitals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 45 employers in Kyle, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Spring Hill 13.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR HealthSouth New England Rehabiliation Hospital - Lowell 14.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Good Shepherd Penn Partners - LTACH (Rittenhouse) 13.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 8598_19904 14.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Empire Acero 242 FTE
STATE-SIZE Melton Electric Inc. 242 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vaden's Acoustics and Drywall 242 FTE
STATE-SIZE 997 242 FTE
CITY-NEAR TXAUS41 ASCENSION SETON MEDICAL CTR HAYS 954 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-TXAUS41 737 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - AUS5 637 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4130 328 FTE
NAT-TCR Abington Manor 13.9 TCR
NAT-TCR MediWaste Disposal 13.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Carolina Rehabilitation Center of Burke 13.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Channel Islands Berry Farms, Inc. 13.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Republic National Distributing Company 11 242 FTE
NAT-SIZE Broomall Presbyterian Village 242 FTE
NAT-SIZE Neenah Paper Whiting 242 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mia Hub 242 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.