Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Nebraska

Legacy Terrace

Lincoln, NE · ~181 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Legacy Terrace runs at 87% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Legacy Terrace: 3.3 TCR = 87% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Legacy Terrace safety composite

Legacy Terrace scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2016→2024

Legacy Terrace injury rate improved

Legacy Terrace's TCR fell 3.3 from 4.9 in 2016 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.9 · 2017=4.8 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=4.0 · 2024=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Lincoln, NE AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 87% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #10/56
  • PHOTO Focused Care at Hunt…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~181 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Focused Care at Huntsville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nebraska employers → · Look up another →

Legacy Terrace in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Legacy Terrace averages 3.3 TCR (87% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Legacy Terrace TCR series: 2016=4.9 · 2017=4.8 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=4 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Legacy Terrace falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 56 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Nebraska.

Legacy Terrace (181 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Legacy Terrace
Legacy Terrace (181 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Legacy Terrace has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 1.6 2 0 0
2023 4.0 1.6 4 1 0
2022 3.4 2.5 4 0 0
2021 2.5 1.6 3 0 0
2020 1.5 0.8 1 1 0
2019 3.1 0.8 3 1 0
2018 3.9 0.8 3 2 0
2017 4.8 3.2 5 1 0
2016 4.9 3.3 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · NE · Lincoln

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,594 rated employers in Nebraska with headcount on file · 496 employers in Lincoln, NE · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Focused Care at Huntsville 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Blake at Colonial Club 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edencrest Riverwoods 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Robin Way 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE 28263 HILTON OMAHA NE 181 FTE
STATE-SIZE BELLEVUE NE PLANT 180 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cleaver-Brooks 180 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 2579 182 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nelnet Servicing LLC 2,850 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nelnet - Lincoln HQ 2,491 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bryan East Campus 2,358 FTE
CITY-NEAR FACTS Education Corporation 1,986 FTE
NAT-TCR Laminations Southeast 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Century Steel Erectors Co. 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Hulett Environmental Services, Inc. - Palm Beach office 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Penn Installations, Inc 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE B G Brecke Inc 181 FTE
NAT-SIZE Austin Tgs Div of 181 FTE
NAT-SIZE Weather Shield Mfg Inc.--- Park Falls Plant 15 181 FTE
NAT-SIZE R. E. Darling Co., Inc. 181 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.