Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innerspring, noninnerspring) manufacturing · Mississippi

Leggett & Platt Bedding Tupelo

Tupelo, MS · ~39 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Leggett & Platt Bedding Tupelo runs at 76% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innerspring, noninnerspring) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Leggett & Platt Bedding Tupelo: 2.5 TCR = 76% of Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innerspring, noninnerspring) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Leggett & Platt Bedding Tupelo safety composite

Leggett & Platt Bedding Tupelo scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.5

2021→2023

Leggett & Platt Bedding Tupelo injury rate improved

Leggett & Platt Bedding Tupelo's TCR fell 7.5 from 7.5 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 7.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=7.5 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 337910 · Tupelo, MS AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 76% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/8
  • PHOTO Jeffco Fibres, Inc.
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jeffco Fibres, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Leggett & Platt Bedding Tupelo in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Leggett & Platt Bedding Tupelo averages 2.5 TCR (76% of the Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innerspring, noninnerspring) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Leggett & Platt Bedding Tupelo TCR series: 2021=7.5 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Leggett & Platt Bedding Tupelo falls in its industry

160 Mattresses (i.e., box spring, establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 8 Mattresses (i.e., box spring, employers in Mississippi.

Leggett & Platt Bedding Tupelo (39 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Leggett & Platt Bedding Tupelo
Leggett & Platt Bedding Tupelo (39 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Leggett & Platt Bedding Tupelo has fewer employees than the Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innersprin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 7.5 7.5 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

337910 · MS · Tupelo

160 Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innerspring, noninnerspring) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 144 employers in Tupelo, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jeffco Fibres, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Serta Simmons Bedding Monroe 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ennis Spring 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Simmons Waycross 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Chevron Co-Generating Plant 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coast Service Center 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Fire Sprinkler, Inc. 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE ISO Panels, Inc. 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Mississippi Medical Center 5,727 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tupelo Cooper Tire & Rubber Plant (SIC 3011) 1,416 FTE
CITY-NEAR JESCO, Inc. 394 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tupelo Operations 393 FTE
NAT-TCR GC7 Airport Dr, Gold Creek Processing, LLC. 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Zoom Group Inc 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR First Student Lawnside NJ 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Bridges & Company, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Beck's El Paso 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Schumacher Company LC 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bullitt County Judicial Center 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Obrecht Realty Services Inc. 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.