Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innerspring, noninnerspring) manufacturing · Ohio

Serta Simmons Bedding Monroe

Monroe, OH · ~187 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Serta Simmons Bedding Monroe runs at 75% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innerspring, noninnerspring) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Serta Simmons Bedding Monroe: 2.5 TCR = 75% of Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innerspring, noninnerspring) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Serta Simmons Bedding Monroe safety composite

Serta Simmons Bedding Monroe scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.5

2016→2021

Serta Simmons Bedding Monroe injury rate improved

Serta Simmons Bedding Monroe's TCR fell 5.5 from 6.2 in 2016 to 0.7 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.2 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=1.0 · 2020=3.0 · 2021=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 337910 · Monroe, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 75% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #3/13
  • PHOTO Jeffco Fibres, Inc.
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 33 inj
  • SIZE ~187 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jeffco Fibres, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Serta Simmons Bedding Monroe in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Serta Simmons Bedding Monroe averages 2.5 TCR (75% of the Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innerspring, noninnerspring) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Serta Simmons Bedding Monroe TCR series: 2016=6.2 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=1 · 2020=3 · 2021=0.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Serta Simmons Bedding Monroe falls in its industry

160 Mattresses (i.e., box spring, establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 13 Mattresses (i.e., box spring, employers in Ohio.

Serta Simmons Bedding Monroe (187 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Serta Simmons Bedding Monroe
Serta Simmons Bedding Monroe (187 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Serta Simmons Bedding Monroe has more employees than the Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innersprin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2020 3.0 1.5 4 0 0
2019 1.0 1.0 2 0 0
2018 1.4 0.7 4 0 0
2016 6.2 3.3 22 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

337910 · OH · Monroe

160 Mattresses (i.e., box spring, innerspring, noninnerspring) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 72 employers in Monroe, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jeffco Fibres, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Leggett & Platt Bedding Tupelo 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ennis Spring 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Serta Simmons Bedding West Palm Beach 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE CCL Design 187 FTE
STATE-SIZE INEOS ABS LLC 187 FTE
STATE-SIZE FreshProductsPerrysburg 187 FTE
STATE-SIZE APS Streetsboro Corp Machinery 187 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baker Concrete Constructors LLC 3,453 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CMH3 1,851 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baker Concrete Construction, Inc. 1,848 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - CMH3 1,174 FTE
NAT-TCR 4769-296-Pottery Barn 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 4769-834-Pottery Barn 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR CHI St. Joseph Children's Health 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Northeastern Oklahoma a&M Coll 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE St. Edna Sub-Acute and Rehabilitation Center 187 FTE
NAT-SIZE Home Health Care - OFP 187 FTE
NAT-SIZE Multi-Craft Contractors - Springfield 187 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shiloh Pierceton 187 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.