For-sale builders (i.e., building on own land, for sale), single-family housing · Washington

Lennar - Portland

Vancouver, WA · ~101 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lennar - Portland runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical For-sale builders (i.e., building on own land, for sale), single-family housing workplace, earning a grade B.

Lennar - Portland: 2.7 TCR = 72% of For-sale builders (i.e., building on own land, for sale), single-family housing BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lennar - Portland safety composite

Lennar - Portland scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.8

2019→2023

Lennar - Portland injury rate improved

Lennar - Portland's TCR fell 5.8 from 5.8 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=5.8 · 2020=5.2 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236117 · Vancouver, WA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.7 · 72% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/10
  • PHOTO KB Home - Tucson Div…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~101 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: KB Home - Tucson Division Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Lennar - Portland in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lennar - Portland averages 2.7 TCR (72% of the For-sale builders (i.e., building on own land, for sale), single-family housing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lennar - Portland TCR series: 2019=5.8 · 2020=5.2 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Lennar - Portland falls in its industry

341 For-sale builders (i.e., build establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 10 For-sale builders (i.e., build employers in Washington.

Lennar - Portland (101 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Lennar - Portland
Lennar - Portland (101 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Lennar - Portland has more employees than the For-sale builders (i.e., building on own median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2021 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2020 5.2 0.0 3 0 0
2019 5.8 2.9 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236117 · WA · Vancouver

341 For-sale builders (i.e., building on own land, for sale), single-family housing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 490 employers in Vancouver, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR KB Home - Tucson Division Office 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR CASTLEROCK DEVELOPMENT 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 103-DREES-CORP FT MITCHELL 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 500-DREES-RALEIGH 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wilcox Construction LLC 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE Donald B Murphy Contractors, Inc 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE Darigold 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE Purcell Systems 101 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hawthorn Senior Living 3,847 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southwest Medical Center Main Campus 3,464 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6994-PL600 1,970 FTE
CITY-NEAR 600 1,922 FTE
NAT-TCR Terra Bella Northridge 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Highland Park Market of Farmington, LLC 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Ace Telephone Association Houston 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Arland - Sturbridge 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Impact Fire - Raleigh FESS 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE MDC Interior Solutions 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ennis Steel Industries, Inc. - Ennis Plant 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Suburban Woods Health & Rehabilitation Center 101 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.