For-sale builders (i.e., building on own land, for sale), single-family housing · California

Castlerock Development

San Luis Obispo, CA · ~20 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Castlerock Development runs at 73% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical For-sale builders (i.e., building on own land, for sale), single-family housing workplace, earning a grade B.

Castlerock Development: 2.8 TCR = 73% of For-sale builders (i.e., building on own land, for sale), single-family housing BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Castlerock Development safety composite

Castlerock Development scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Castlerock Development held a steady TCR band

Castlerock Development's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=8.0 · 2019=4.7 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2023=6.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236117 · San Luis Obispo, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.8 · 73% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #33/43
  • PHOTO Charlotte Division
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Charlotte Division (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Castlerock Development in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Castlerock Development averages 2.8 TCR (73% of the For-sale builders (i.e., building on own land, for sale), single-family housing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Castlerock Development TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=8 · 2019=4.7 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2023=6.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Castlerock Development falls in its industry

341 For-sale builders (i.e., build establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 43 For-sale builders (i.e., build employers in California.

Castlerock Development (20 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Castlerock Development
Castlerock Development (20 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Castlerock Development has fewer employees than the For-sale builders (i.e., building on own median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 6.8 6.8 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.7 4.7 1 0 0
2018 8.0 8.0 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236117 · CA · San Luis Obispo

341 For-sale builders (i.e., building on own land, for sale), single-family housing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 177 employers in San Luis Obispo, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Charlotte Division 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lennar - Portland 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR KB Home - Tucson Division Office 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR PENSACOLA FL 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sills Farms, Inc. 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE F A Maggiore & Sons, LLC 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE CALMEX CONTRACTING INC 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Velvet Antler Ranch LLC 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bella Vista Transitional Care Center 8,119 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Men's Colony - San Luis Obispo 1,599 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Men's Colony 1,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 279 946 FTE
NAT-TCR Rouses Market #27 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Amber Oaks Assisted Living 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Plastipak- Havre de Grace 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR MANUF 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Arc Adult Training Services 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Foltz Buildings 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Air Conditioning Technology & Services, Inc. 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oakbrook Terrace Fire Protection District 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.