Housing construction, for-sale builder · North Carolina

Lennar Raleigh/Durham

Morrisville, NC · ~259 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lennar Raleigh/Durham runs at 19% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Housing construction, for-sale builder workplace, earning a grade A.

Lennar Raleigh/Durham: 0.7 TCR = 19% of Housing construction, for-sale builder BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lennar Raleigh/Durham safety composite

Lennar Raleigh/Durham scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Lennar Raleigh/Durham held a steady TCR band

Lennar Raleigh/Durham's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236117 · Morrisville, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 19% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/17
  • PHOTO Lennar - Idaho
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~259 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lennar - Idaho (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Lennar Raleigh/Durham in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lennar Raleigh/Durham averages 0.7 TCR (19% of the Housing construction, for-sale builder BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lennar Raleigh/Durham TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Lennar Raleigh/Durham falls in its industry

341 Housing construction, for-sale establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 17 Housing construction, for-sale employers in North Carolina.

Lennar Raleigh/Durham (259 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Lennar Raleigh/Durham
Lennar Raleigh/Durham (259 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 79 employees and a TCR of 1.7

Lennar Raleigh/Durham has more employees than the Housing construction, for-sale builder median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.9 0.4 2 0 0
2022 0.8 0.4 2 0 0
2021 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.8 0.5 4 0 0
2018 1.8 1.2 3 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236117 · NC · Morrisville

341 Housing construction, for-sale builder employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 219 employers in Morrisville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lennar - Idaho 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tri Pointe Homes Dallas-Fort Worth 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR One Penn Center - Ste 110,200,300 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Design Rd 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sunenergy1 259 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coats Pharr HP 259 FTE
STATE-SIZE UPM Raflatac, Inc 259 FTE
STATE-SIZE TriSeal 259 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lenovo - Development Drive 2,354 FTE
CITY-NEAR NC_Morrisville_4200 Paramount Pkwy_ECA42PAR 962 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lenovo - Think Place 794 FTE
CITY-NEAR Teleflex Morrisville 649 FTE
NAT-TCR Covestro Newark 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Ludlum Measurements, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR HF Scientific 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Derby 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Stevens Construction Corporation 259 FTE
NAT-SIZE Morristown Drivers Service, Inc. 259 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shore Point Distributing Co., Inc. 259 FTE
NAT-SIZE Olin Corporation - Charleston plant 259 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.