Level gauges, radiation-type, manufacturing · Texas

Ludlum Measurements, Inc.

Sweetwater, TX · ~412 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ludlum Measurements, Inc. runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Level gauges, radiation-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Ludlum Measurements, Inc.: 0.7 TCR = 22% of Level gauges, radiation-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ludlum Measurements, Inc. safety composite

Ludlum Measurements, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Ludlum Measurements, Inc.: 0.6 → 1.1 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 1.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Ludlum Measurements, Inc.'s TCR rose 0.6 from 0.6 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 1.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334519 · Sweetwater, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 22% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO Digital Solutions : …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~412 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Digital Solutions : MS - Twinsburg, OH (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Ludlum Measurements, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ludlum Measurements, Inc. averages 0.7 TCR (22% of the Level gauges, radiation-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ludlum Measurements, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0.6 · 2017=0.3 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Ludlum Measurements, Inc. falls in its industry

128 Level gauges, radiation-type, establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 Level gauges, radiation-type, employers in Texas.

Ludlum Measurements, Inc. (412 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Ludlum Measurements, Inc.
Ludlum Measurements, Inc. (412 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Ludlum Measurements, Inc. has more employees than the Level gauges, radiation-type, manufactur median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 0.0 6 0 0
2023 1.3 0.2 6 0 0
2022 0.7 0.0 3 0 0
2021 0.5 0.3 2 0 0
2020 0.5 0.0 2 0 0
2019 0.7 0.0 3 0 0
2018 0.8 0.3 3 0 0
2017 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2016 0.6 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334519 · TX · Sweetwater

128 Level gauges, radiation-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 23 employers in Sweetwater, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Digital Solutions : MS - Twinsburg, OH 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR MTS Systems 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR ChemDAQ Inc 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rosemount Specialty Products - East Wenatchee 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rich Products - Missouri City 412 FTE
STATE-SIZE GS Operating LLC dba Gexpro Services 412 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3572 412 FTE
STATE-SIZE 228 412 FTE
CITY-NEAR US Gypsum Sweetwater 244 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3381 205 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3381 204 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX255 Sweetwater Gypsum West 168 FTE
NAT-TCR Covestro Newark 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Derby 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Roanoke Rapids 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lennar Raleigh/Durham 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Messiah Lifeways at Messiah Village 412 FTE
NAT-SIZE MBS Textbook Exchange, LLC 412 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chicago South 412 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maples Industries Plant One Location 412 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.