Buildings, prefabricated, wood, manufacturing · North Carolina

Leonard Plant and Office Facilities

Mount Airy, NC · ~209 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Leonard Plant and Office Facilities runs at 281% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Buildings, prefabricated, wood, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Leonard Plant and Office Facilities: 9.3 TCR = 281% of Buildings, prefabricated, wood, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Leonard Plant and Office Facilities safety composite

Leonard Plant and Office Facilities scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 9.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Leonard Plant and Office Facilities: 7.5 → 11.0 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 11.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.97× in 2019

Leonard Plant and Office Facilities's TCR rose 3.5 from 7.5 in 2017 to 11.0 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0.97× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321992 · Mount Airy, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.3 · 281% of ind

  • DART 9.0 DART
  • RANK #5/5
  • PHOTO Timberhaven Log Home…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 36 inj
  • SIZE ~209 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Timberhaven Log Homes, LLC (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Leonard Plant and Office Facilities in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Leonard Plant and Office Facilities averages 9.3 TCR (281% of the Buildings, prefabricated, wood, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Leonard Plant and Office Facilities TCR series: 2017=7.5 · 2019=11 · BLS 3.3

Where Leonard Plant and Office Facilities falls in its industry

177 Buildings, prefabricated, wood establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 5 Buildings, prefabricated, wood employers in North Carolina.

Leonard Plant and Office Facilities (209 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 7.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Leonard Plant and Office Facilities
Leonard Plant and Office Facilities (209 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 7.7

Leonard Plant and Office Facilities has more employees than the Buildings, prefabricated, wood, manufact median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 11.0 9.0 22 0 0
2017 7.5 4.3 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321992 · NC · Mount Airy

177 Buildings, prefabricated, wood, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 94 employers in Mount Airy, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Timberhaven Log Homes, LLC 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Advanced Modular Mfg. 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Autovol Inc 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Britton Panel Mfg & NexGen Admin Office 9.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Utili-Serve LLC 209 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clayton Homes Oxford NC 209 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mooresville, NC 209 FTE
STATE-SIZE 276040000 209 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pike Florida Statewide Operations 1,583 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pike North Carolina Statewide Operations 1,161 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pike Georgia Statewide Operations 969 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pike Texas Statewide Operations 738 FTE
NAT-TCR Rides Mass Transit District 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ach Lakeside Hospital 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Good Samaritan Society-Jackson 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Earle M. Jorgensen Company Cleveland Plate Center 9.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE CHS 209 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lear Guilford - Pine Grove PD 209 FTE
NAT-SIZE DNC Parks & Resorts at Shenandoah, Inc. 209 FTE
NAT-SIZE Caterpillar VSI/DSI Pontiac 209 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.