Fruit and tree nut combination farming · California

Leopoldo'S Farm Service, Inc.

Kingsburg, CA · ~2,541 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Leopoldo'S Farm Service, Inc. runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Fruit and tree nut combination farming workplace, earning a grade B.

Leopoldo'S Farm Service, Inc.: 3.0 TCR = 68% of Fruit and tree nut combination farming BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Leopoldo'S Farm Service, Inc. safety composite

Leopoldo'S Farm Service, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Leopoldo'S Farm Service, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Leopoldo'S Farm Service, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.3 from 2.8 in 2017 to 2.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.8 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=3.4 · 2024=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 111336 · Kingsburg, CA AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade B · TCR 3.0 · 68% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #8/48
  • PHOTO Fruit Harvest No 2 Inc
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 109 inj
  • SIZE ~2,541 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fruit Harvest No 2 Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Leopoldo'S Farm Service, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Leopoldo'S Farm Service, Inc. averages 3.0 TCR (68% of the Fruit and tree nut combination farming BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Leopoldo'S Farm Service, Inc. TCR series: 2017=2.8 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=3.4 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 4.5

Where Leopoldo'S Farm Service, Inc. falls in its industry

65 Fruit and tree nut combination establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 48 Fruit and tree nut combination employers in California.

Leopoldo'S Farm Service, Inc. (2,541 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 6.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Leopoldo'S Farm Service, Inc.
Leopoldo'S Farm Service, Inc. (2,541 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 6.0

Leopoldo'S Farm Service, Inc. has more employees than the Fruit and tree nut combination farming median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 0.4 12 0 0
2022 3.4 1.5 14 0 0
2021 3.2 2.3 14 0 0
2020 2.9 2.1 14 0 0
2019 3.3 1.9 19 0 0
2017 2.8 1.7 36 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

111336 · CA · Kingsburg

65 Fruit and tree nut combination farming employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 62 employers in Kingsburg, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fruit Harvest No 2 Inc 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rogers Orchards 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Samascott Orchards LLC 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Illume Agriculture, LLC 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 260 2,546 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 261 2,546 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 203 2,546 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 231 2,546 FTE
CITY-NEAR OFR INC 1,020 FTE
CITY-NEAR EDITH VILLALBASO 747 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kingsburg Fruit Packing Inc. 524 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kingsburg Apple Packers, Inc. 487 FTE
NAT-TCR Moiron- A Div. of Leggett & Platt Components Co., Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sunset GV LLC - dba Wildfire Casino & Lanes 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Visone Construction Inc 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Mid-Carolina Electric Coop 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Seattle University 2,541 FTE
NAT-SIZE 43rd Street (Ny43r) 2,543 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pritchard Industries Southwest, LLC. 2,544 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mercy Hospital Oklahoma City 2,545 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.