Electric power distribution systems · Kentucky

Lexington Distribution Operations Center

Lexington, KY · ~77 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lexington Distribution Operations Center runs at 143% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Electric power distribution systems workplace, earning a grade D.

Lexington Distribution Operations Center: 1.7 TCR = 143% of Electric power distribution systems BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lexington Distribution Operations Center safety composite

Lexington Distribution Operations Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Lexington Distribution Operations Center: 0.0 → 5.1 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 5.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.75× in 2018

Lexington Distribution Operations Center's TCR rose 5.1 from 0.0 in 2016 to 5.1 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Lexington, KY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 1.7 · 143% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #18/56
  • PHOTO Flint SC
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~77 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Flint SC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Lexington Distribution Operations Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lexington Distribution Operations Center averages 1.7 TCR (143% of the Electric power distribution systems BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lexington Distribution Operations Center TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=5.1 · BLS 1.2

Where Lexington Distribution Operations Center falls in its industry

2,958 Electric power distribution sy establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 56 Electric power distribution sy employers in Kentucky.

Lexington Distribution Operations Center (77 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Lexington Distribution Operations Center
Lexington Distribution Operations Center (77 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Lexington Distribution Operations Center has more employees than the Electric power distribution systems median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 5.1 1.3 4 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · KY · Lexington

2,958 Electric power distribution systems employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 652 employers in Lexington, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Flint SC 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ridgeland 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lorain Medina Rural Electric Co-op 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corbitt Power and Light 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE American Roofing & Metal Lexington 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rabbit Hole Spirits, LLC 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Derby Fabricating Solutions - Louisville 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE ECKART America - Louisville 77 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Kentucky - Main Campus - Fayette County 11,013 FTE
CITY-NEAR UK Healthcare 9,922 FTE
CITY-NEAR YMCA of Central KY - Gatton Beaumont 3,933 FTE
CITY-NEAR YMCA of Central Ky - High Street 3,895 FTE
NAT-TCR M. Block & Sons Bedford Park 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Chevron Co-Generating Plant 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR KTC 50020 Collins 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR HQ 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Westco Express, Inc. 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Dedham 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1830 Miller Parkway Streetsboro Ohio 44241 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sales - Great Smokies - The Wilderness 77 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.