Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Mississippi

Chevron Co-Generating Plant

Pascagoula, MS · ~39 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Chevron Co-Generating Plant runs at 143% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade D.

Chevron Co-Generating Plant: 1.7 TCR = 143% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Chevron Co-Generating Plant safety composite

Chevron Co-Generating Plant scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Chevron Co-Generating Plant: 0.0 → 2.6 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 2.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.5× in 2018

Chevron Co-Generating Plant's TCR rose 2.6 from 0.0 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.6 TCR. In 2018, DART was 1.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Pascagoula, MS ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 1.7 · 143% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #11/16
  • PHOTO Vectren Corporation …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Vectren Corporation - FB Culley (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Chevron Co-Generating Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Chevron Co-Generating Plant averages 1.7 TCR (143% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Chevron Co-Generating Plant TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=2.6 · BLS 1.2

Where Chevron Co-Generating Plant falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 16 Electric power generation, fos employers in Mississippi.

Chevron Co-Generating Plant (39 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Chevron Co-Generating Plant
Chevron Co-Generating Plant (39 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Chevron Co-Generating Plant has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2017 2.6 0.0 0 1 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · MS · Pascagoula

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 59 employers in Pascagoula, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Vectren Corporation - FB Culley 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tenaska Kiamichi Generating Station 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kennedy International Airport Power Plant 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 00556 LAYTONDAVIS OFF 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Coast Service Center 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Fire Sprinkler, Inc. 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE ISO Panels, Inc. 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Craft Croswell LLC 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ingalls Shipbuilding 11,345 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pascagoula Refinery 1,566 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bollinger Mississippi Shipbuilding, LLC 850 FTE
CITY-NEAR VT Halter Marine 292 Pascagoula 777 FTE
NAT-TCR Muldraugh Compressor Station 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lexington Distribution Operations Center 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR M. Block & Sons Bedford Park 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 6091-SS026 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Police Department, Derby, Connecticut 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sales - Kona 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mountain Laurel Resort 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Krosaki Magnesita Refractories 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.