Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Florida

Lexington Manor

Port Charlotte, FL · ~51 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lexington Manor runs at 220% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Lexington Manor: 8.4 TCR = 220% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lexington Manor safety composite

Lexington Manor scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Lexington Manor: 4.5 → 5.6 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 54.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2023

Lexington Manor's TCR rose 1.1 from 4.5 in 2017 to 5.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 54.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Port Charlotte, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.4 · 220% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #244/396
  • PHOTO 10788
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 10788 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Lexington Manor in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lexington Manor averages 8.4 TCR (220% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lexington Manor TCR series: 2017=4.5 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=6.2 · 2020=54.6 · 2021=20.2 · 2022=11.4 · 2023=5.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Lexington Manor falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #244 safest of 396 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Florida.

Lexington Manor (51 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Lexington Manor
Lexington Manor (51 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Lexington Manor has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 5.6 0.0 2 0 0
2022 11.4 0.0 0 3 0
2021 20.2 14.4 2 5 0
2020 54.6 52.1 5 17 0
2019 6.2 4.2 2 1 0
2018 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2017 4.5 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · FL · Port Charlotte

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 101 employers in Port Charlotte, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 10788 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Jensen Beach 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Beach House Assisted Living and Memory Care 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Orchard Pointe at Surprise 8.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE CGC Agri-Management Inc. 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phillip Rucks Citrus Nursery, Inc. 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Training Center 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fort Walton District Office 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR Port Charlotte Office 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR Port Charlotte Hospice House 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR Englewood Office 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR Englewood Hospice House 2,388 FTE
NAT-TCR Blue Ribbon Grounds Services 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR RK-079-Greenwood ( RK-079 ) 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Northeast Methodist Hospital 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Henry Schein - UTSLT 8.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gwyn Services 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mountainside Wood Products 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woolpert- Atlanta 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Micron Metalworks, LLC 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.