Hospitals, general medical and surgical · Texas

Northeast Methodist Hospital

San Antonio, TX · ~886 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
8.4
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Northeast Methodist Hospital runs at 111% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Hospitals, general medical and surgical workplace, earning a grade C.

Northeast Methodist Hospital: 8.4 TCR = 111% of Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS 7.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Northeast Methodist Hospital safety composite

Northeast Methodist Hospital scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Northeast Methodist Hospital: 6.9 → 10.2 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 10.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.5× in 2022

Northeast Methodist Hospital's TCR rose 3.4 from 6.9 in 2016 to 10.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 10.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · San Antonio, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 8.4 · 111% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #469/520
  • PHOTO University Health Se…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 347 inj
  • SIZE ~886 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: University Health Service UIC UI Health (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Northeast Methodist Hospital in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Northeast Methodist Hospital averages 8.4 TCR (111% of the Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Northeast Methodist Hospital TCR series: 2016=6.9 · 2017=7.1 · 2018=5.7 · 2019=9.3 · 2020=10.9 · 2022=10.2 · BLS 7.5

Where Northeast Methodist Hospital falls in its industry

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #469 safest of 520 Hospitals, general medical and employers in Texas.

Northeast Methodist Hospital (886 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Northeast Methodist Hospital
Northeast Methodist Hospital (886 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Northeast Methodist Hospital has more employees than the Hospitals, general medical and surgical median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 10.2 4.2 80 0 0
2020 10.9 3.6 78 0 0
2019 9.3 2.7 63 2 0
2018 5.7 0.9 38 1 0
2017 7.1 2.1 48 0 0
2016 6.9 1.0 40 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · TX · San Antonio

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and surgical employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR University Health Service UIC UI Health 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amita Health Mercy Medical Center 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Adventisth Health - Portland 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR St. Francis Eastside 8.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cypress Semiconductor Austin 886 FTE
STATE-SIZE 102 RNDC-DALLAS GRAND PRAIRIE 887 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marek Houston 888 FTE
STATE-SIZE SOUTHWEST 888 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR Greif 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Blue Ribbon Grounds Services 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Lexington Manor 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 6957-DAY 8.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Penfield Site 886 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ace Electric Inc. - All Establishments 886 FTE
NAT-SIZE Toa, USA 886 FTE
NAT-SIZE LAS - Ground Ops 886 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.