Construction management, mass transit · Montana

LHC, Inc

Kalispell, MT · ~154 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

LHC, Inc runs at 226% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Construction management, mass transit workplace, earning a grade F.

LHC, Inc: 6.3 TCR = 226% of Construction management, mass transit BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

LHC, Inc safety composite

LHC, Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 9% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

7/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

LHC, Inc: 6.3 → 7.1 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 8.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.71× in 2024

LHC, Inc's TCR rose 0.8 from 6.3 in 2016 to 7.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 8.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237990 · Kalispell, MT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 6.3 · 226% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #4/4
  • PHOTO Westside Purple Line…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 94 inj
  • SIZE ~154 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Westside Purple Line, Section 1 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Montana employers → · Look up another →

LHC, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows LHC, Inc averages 6.3 TCR (226% of the Construction management, mass transit BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

LHC, Inc TCR series: 2016=6.3 · 2017=6.3 · 2018=4.7 · 2019=5.8 · 2020=5.9 · 2021=6.8 · 2022=6.2 · 2023=8.2 · 2024=7.1 · BLS 2.8

Where LHC, Inc falls in its industry

932 Construction management, mass establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Montana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 4 Construction management, mass employers in Montana.

LHC, Inc (154 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate LHC, Inc
LHC, Inc (154 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5

LHC, Inc has more employees than the Construction management, mass transit median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.1 4.5 11 0 0
2023 8.2 4.4 13 0 1
2022 6.2 5.6 10 0 0
2021 6.8 5.6 12 0 0
2020 5.9 3.7 11 0 0
2019 5.8 4.0 10 0 0
2018 4.7 4.7 8 0 0
2017 6.3 5.7 9 1 0
2016 6.3 3.8 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237990 · MT · Kalispell

932 Construction management, mass transit employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,536 rated employers in Montana with headcount on file · 117 employers in Kalispell, MT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Westside Purple Line, Section 1 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Murray Logan 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cooper Rail Service Inc. d/b/a Cooper Contracting 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dot Diamond Core Drilling, Inc. 6.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE MISSOULA (MTMIS) 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE Logan Health Brendan House (formerly Northwest Horizons/Brendan House) 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE JTL Group Inc. DBA Knife River-Billings 155 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fabricators Unlimited - Billings 155 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kalispell Regional Medical Center 2,715 FTE
CITY-NEAR Logan Health Medical Center (formerly Kalispell Regional Medical Center) 2,601 FTE
CITY-NEAR Logan Health (formerly Kalispell Regional Healthcare-System) 494 FTE
CITY-NEAR MTK01, Applied Materials, Semi Tool Main 406 FTE
NAT-TCR Loren Cook Company - Springfield 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Vermeer Corporation - Pella 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR GR 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Westport Store 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE PRG Packing 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hammond Lumber Company - Belgrade 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE American & Efird Gastonia Plant 20 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE Toter - Statesville 154 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.