Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · South Carolina

Life Care Center of Columbia

Columbia, SC · ~158 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Life Care Center of Columbia runs at 57% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade B.

Life Care Center of Columbia: 3.7 TCR = 57% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Life Care Center of Columbia safety composite

Life Care Center of Columbia scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Life Care Center of Columbia: 1.3 → 6.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 6.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.72× in 2024

Life Care Center of Columbia's TCR rose 5.1 from 1.3 in 2022 to 6.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Columbia, SC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.7 · 57% of ind

  • DART 6.4 DART
  • RANK #46/165
  • PHOTO BTNRH West Hospital
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~158 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BTNRH West Hospital (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Life Care Center of Columbia in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Life Care Center of Columbia averages 3.7 TCR (57% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Life Care Center of Columbia TCR series: 2022=1.3 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=6.4 · BLS 6.5

Where Life Care Center of Columbia falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #46 safest of 165 Convalescent homes or convales employers in South Carolina.

Life Care Center of Columbia (158 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Life Care Center of Columbia
Life Care Center of Columbia (158 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Life Care Center of Columbia has more employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.4 6.4 6 0 0
2023 3.5 3.5 4 0 0
2022 1.3 1.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · SC · Columbia

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 542 employers in Columbia, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BTNRH West Hospital 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hamlet Assisted Living Operator LLC 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Life Care Center of Richland 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR CAREONE AT PEABODY 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Safety Components 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenwood 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE Purem Spartanburg 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0559 LOWE S OF ORANGEBURG SC 158 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palmetto Health Richland 5,949 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prisma Health Richland 4,729 FTE
CITY-NEAR South Carolina Department of Transportation 4,400 FTE
CITY-NEAR SC Department of Transportation 3,864 FTE
NAT-TCR Industrial Magnetics, Inc 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 90008150 South Coast Rail C7/ Skanska-D.W. White Joint Venture 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Warwick Publishing Company 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR CalmaxTechnology02 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Winland Foods Inc. 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE Keystone RV Crossroads - Plant 501 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kahl Home 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE RiverCentre 158 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.