Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Pennsylvania

LifeServices - Hawthorne Woods

Washington, PA · ~44 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

LifeServices - Hawthorne Woods runs at 268% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

LifeServices - Hawthorne Woods: 10.2 TCR = 268% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

LifeServices - Hawthorne Woods safety composite

LifeServices - Hawthorne Woods scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
F 22.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

LifeServices - Hawthorne Woods: 7.1 → 22.7 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 22.7 TCR · DART/TCR 2.23× in 2022

LifeServices - Hawthorne Woods's TCR rose 15.6 from 7.1 in 2016 to 22.7 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 2.23× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Washington, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.2 · 268% of ind

  • DART 22.7 DART
  • RANK #176/257
  • PHOTO Westminster St Augus…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Westminster St Augustine (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

LifeServices - Hawthorne Woods in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows LifeServices - Hawthorne Woods averages 10.2 TCR (268% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

LifeServices - Hawthorne Woods TCR series: 2016=7.1 · 2018=0 · 2019=15.2 · 2020=10.1 · 2021=6 · 2022=22.7 · BLS 3.8

Where LifeServices - Hawthorne Woods falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #176 safest of 257 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Pennsylvania.

LifeServices - Hawthorne Woods (44 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate LifeServices - Hawthorne Woods
LifeServices - Hawthorne Woods (44 employees, TCR 10.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

LifeServices - Hawthorne Woods has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 22.7 22.7 7 0 0
2021 6.0 6.0 2 0 0
2020 10.1 7.6 4 0 0
2019 15.2 15.2 6 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 7.1 4.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · PA · Washington

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 139 employers in Washington, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Westminster St Augustine 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brooke Grove Retirement Village 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brandel Manor 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cedarhurst Living, LLC - Dyer 10.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Milton Grove Egg 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kreider Farms - Donegal Egg 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE WESSC West Shore Service Center 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE SUNSC Sunbury Service Center 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Washington Hospital 1,630 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Meadows Racetrack and Casino 1,245 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hollywood Casino at The Meadows 802 FTE
CITY-NEAR Songer Services Incorporated 621 FTE
NAT-TCR NYBC-Westbury 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 240052-Bos-Arlington Br 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 354172-Jam-St Albans Sta 10.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 358710-Valley Stream Po 10.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sawmiller LLC 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Otter Products - San Diego 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE PTR- Precision Technologies, Inc. 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Firebaugh 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.