Clinics/centers of health practitioners from more than one industry practicing within the same establishment · California

Life@Wellness Center

Menlo Park, CA · ~120 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Life@Wellness Center runs at 64% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Clinics/centers of health practitioners from more than one industry practicing within the same establishment workplace, earning a grade B.

Life@Wellness Center: 2.4 TCR = 64% of Clinics/centers of health practitioners from more than one industry practicing within the same establishment BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Life@Wellness Center safety composite

Life@Wellness Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2019→2020

Life@Wellness Center injury rate improved

Life@Wellness Center's TCR fell 2.6 from 3.8 in 2019 to 1.1 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.8 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=3.8 · 2020=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621498 · Menlo Park, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 64% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #20/132
  • PHOTO SHMG - Skyline Village
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~120 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SHMG - Skyline Village (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Life@Wellness Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Life@Wellness Center averages 2.4 TCR (64% of the Clinics/centers of health practitioners from more than one industry practicing within the same establishment BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Life@Wellness Center TCR series: 2019=3.8 · 2020=1.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Life@Wellness Center falls in its industry

599 Clinics/centers of health prac establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 132 Clinics/centers of health prac employers in California.

Life@Wellness Center (120 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Life@Wellness Center
Life@Wellness Center (120 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Life@Wellness Center has more employees than the Clinics/centers of health practitioners median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2019 3.8 1.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621498 · CA · Menlo Park

599 Clinics/centers of health practitioners from more than one industry practicing within the same establishment employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 62 employers in Menlo Park, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SHMG - Skyline Village 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valley Health Team - San Joaquin CHC 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Baldwin Family Health Care - Grant 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR InterMed LL Bean 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Spreckels 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE VF - Healdsburg 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ito Brothers Inc. 120 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crown Citrus 120 FTE
CITY-NEAR SH Menlo Park 628 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rudolph and Sletten 516 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rosewood Sand Hill 430 FTE
CITY-NEAR Care Indeed Inc 381 FTE
NAT-TCR Harry's Mother (including Admin & Reception Center) 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Clayton Windows 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Seaonus Stevedoring - Savannah LLC 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR TTS - Georgia 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Somerset Welding & Steel Company Inc.- Dump Plant 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peckham Road Corp 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE CMCO Lexington Operations 120 FTE
NAT-SIZE Williamson Street Grocery Cooperative East 120 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.