Window frames and sash, wood and covered wood, manufacturing · Tennessee
Clayton Windows
Crossville, TN · ~130 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- B
- Good Safety Record
- 2.4
- Avg TCR
- 3.3
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Clayton Windows runs at 73% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Window frames and sash, wood and covered wood, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.
- B
- Good Safety Record
- 2.4
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 3.3
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 15
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Clayton Windows's OSHA Total Case Rate of 2.4 to the Window frames and sash, wood and covered wood, manufacturing BLS benchmark of 3.3 (73% of benchmark) across 5 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). This reflects reported recordable injuries, not an independent safety inspection -- underreporting is a known limitation of employer self-recordkeeping.
Injury rate over time
Clayton Windows's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.3 industry benchmark.
Where Clayton Windows falls in its industry
473 Window frames and sash, wood a establishmentsSafer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.
Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 19 Window frames and sash, wood a employers in Tennessee.
Trend analysis for Clayton Windows
Between 2016 and 2020, Clayton Windows's Total Case Rate held roughly steady from 3.2 to 3.3 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 3% increase across 4 years of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2018, at a TCR of 0.8, while 2020 saw the highest rate, at 3.3, a spread of 2.4 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a wide swing relative to the establishment's overall rate, worth checking the year-by-year table below for whether a single severe year is driving the average, rather than a sustained trend.
Summed across those 5 reporting years, Clayton Windows recorded 15 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 5-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 15 injuries shown on this page for Clayton Windows are sourced from its own 5 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 321911 - Window frames and sash, wood and covered wood, manufacturing.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2020)
What is the DART rate formula?
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
3 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 246,464 hours worked = 2.43 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Clayton Windows (this establishment) | 2.42 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 5-year avg |
| Door frames and sash, wood and covered wood, manufacturing industry avg | 3.30 | BLS IIF, NAICS 321911 |
| Tennessee state avg (all industries) | 4.09 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Clayton Windows to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2020: 4 reportable incidents · 4 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2019: 3 reportable incidents · 3 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2018: 1 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2017: 3 reportable incidents · 3 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2016: 4 reportable incidents · 4 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 3.3 | 2.4 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 2.4 | 1.6 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 2.5 | 0.8 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 3.2 | 2.4 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Clayton Windows's reported OSHA injury record, strong versus its Window frames and sash, wood and covered wood, manufacturing peers, but not a guarantee about any single site today.
- At 73% of the Window frames and sash, wood and covered wood, manufacturing benchmark, Clayton Windows reports fewer injuries than typical peers, still worth asking how safety is managed day to day. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Window frames and sash, wood and covered wood, manufacturing sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Clayton Windows's safety grade?
How many injuries has Clayton Windows reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Tennessee, and by nearby establishments in Crossville - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~2.4)
Similar size (~130 workers)
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.