Other Chemical and Allied Products Merchant Wholesalers · Michigan

Great Lakes Lansing Plant

Lansing, MI · ~50 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Great Lakes Lansing Plant runs at 39% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Other Chemical and Allied Products Merchant Wholesalers workplace, earning a grade A.

Great Lakes Lansing Plant: 0.8 TCR = 39% of Other Chemical and Allied Products Merchant Wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Great Lakes Lansing Plant safety composite

Great Lakes Lansing Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.7

2016→2023

Great Lakes Lansing Plant injury rate improved

Great Lakes Lansing Plant's TCR fell 4.7 from 4.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.7 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424690 · Lansing, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 39% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/28
  • PHOTO Neo Solutions, Inc.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Neo Solutions, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Great Lakes Lansing Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Great Lakes Lansing Plant averages 0.8 TCR (39% of the Other Chemical and Allied Products Merchant Wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Great Lakes Lansing Plant TCR series: 2016=4.7 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Great Lakes Lansing Plant falls in its industry

766 Other Chemical and Allied Prod establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 28 Other Chemical and Allied Prod employers in Michigan.

Great Lakes Lansing Plant (50 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Great Lakes Lansing Plant
Great Lakes Lansing Plant (50 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Great Lakes Lansing Plant has more employees than the Other Chemical and Allied Products Merch median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.7 2.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424690 · MI · Lansing

766 Other Chemical and Allied Products Merchant Wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 410 employers in Lansing, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Neo Solutions, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Niteo Products LLC Distribution Center 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hillyard Office 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Thompson Brothers 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Commonwealth Commerce Center 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gas Construction Midland 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-City Acoustical 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4066_7786 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lansing Delta Township Assembly 2,608 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Motors Lansing Delta Township Assembly 2,446 FTE
CITY-NEAR LCC - Main 2,258 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lansing Grand River Assembly 1,648 FTE
NAT-TCR HPN White Plains Airport 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Directions for Youth & Families 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Aircraft Component Repair Inc 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Veritiv Operating Company - NY051 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mercy Rehab Hosp Springfield 6784 - 4075 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thomas Upham House 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pan-O-Gold Baking Company-Oakdale, MN 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baierl Ford 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.