Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Minnesota

Lincoln Park Assisted Living

Detroit Lakes, MN · ~22 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lincoln Park Assisted Living runs at 226% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Lincoln Park Assisted Living: 8.6 TCR = 226% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lincoln Park Assisted Living safety composite

Lincoln Park Assisted Living scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Lincoln Park Assisted Living: 0.0 → 8.2 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 37.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Lincoln Park Assisted Living's TCR rose 8.2 from 0.0 in 2017 to 8.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 37.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Detroit Lakes, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.6 · 226% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #152/240
  • PHOTO Great Lakes Manageme…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Great Lakes Management GTHI Cottagewood Rochester (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Lincoln Park Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lincoln Park Assisted Living averages 8.6 TCR (226% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lincoln Park Assisted Living TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=14.4 · 2022=37.4 · 2023=8.8 · 2024=8.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Lincoln Park Assisted Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #152 safest of 240 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

Lincoln Park Assisted Living (22 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Lincoln Park Assisted Living
Lincoln Park Assisted Living (22 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Lincoln Park Assisted Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.2 0.0 1 0 0
2023 8.8 8.8 0 1 0
2022 37.4 37.4 2 3 0
2021 14.4 14.4 1 1 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MN · Detroit Lakes

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 86 employers in Detroit Lakes, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Great Lakes Management GTHI Cottagewood Rochester 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bridges by Epoch at Sudbury 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10380 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR WellQuest of Elk Grove 8.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sunrise Dairy 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Emerald Spring Dairy, Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Silverstreak Dairy LLC, Greenstreak Dairy 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dassel 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Mary's Hospital Detroit Lakes 511 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Marys Hospital - Detroit Lakes 497 FTE
CITY-NEAR Operations - Detroit Lakes, MN 472 FTE
CITY-NEAR BTD Manufacturing Detroit Lakes 448 FTE
NAT-TCR Darlington DAR 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Owensboro 076 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR W. A. Wilson & Sons, Inc. 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR El Toro Water District 8.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE City of Albany Library-Main 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Zimbrick East Side Body Shop 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Albany Public Works-Transit 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at St Margarets Dining 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.