Trucking, general freight, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) · South Carolina

Darlington DAR

Florence, SC · ~26 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Darlington DAR runs at 191% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Trucking, general freight, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) workplace, earning a grade D.

Darlington DAR: 8.6 TCR = 191% of Trucking, general freight, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Darlington DAR safety composite

Darlington DAR scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Darlington DAR: 4.3 → 11.0 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 17.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.27× in 2024

Darlington DAR's TCR rose 6.7 from 4.3 in 2017 to 11.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 17.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484122 · Florence, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 8.6 · 191% of ind

  • DART 11.0 DART
  • RANK #37/46
  • PHOTO 011-PIT
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 011-PIT (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Darlington DAR in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Darlington DAR averages 8.6 TCR (191% of the Trucking, general freight, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Darlington DAR TCR series: 2017=4.3 · 2018=11.5 · 2019=17.9 · 2020=15.4 · 2021=7.1 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=0 · 2024=11 · BLS 4.5

Where Darlington DAR falls in its industry

3,020 Trucking, general freight, lon establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 46 Trucking, general freight, lon employers in South Carolina.

Darlington DAR (26 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Darlington DAR
Darlington DAR (26 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 5.6

Darlington DAR has fewer employees than the Trucking, general freight, long-distance median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.0 11.0 3 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2021 7.1 7.1 2 0 0
2020 15.4 15.4 4 0 0
2019 17.9 14.3 5 0 0
2018 11.5 7.7 3 0 0
2017 4.3 4.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484122 · SC · Florence

3,020 Trucking, general freight, long-distance, less-than-truckload (LTL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 208 employers in Florence, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 011-PIT 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Owensboro 076 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR San Jose CA FXFE-SJC 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6284-YR-205 YT 8.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Walther Farms SC 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE COLUMBIA ENERGY CENTER 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Simpsonville Operations Center 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Savage Rd. Crew Quarters 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR McLeod Regional Medical Center 3,889 FTE
CITY-NEAR MCLEOD REG MED CTR OF PEE DEE MH101 3,883 FTE
CITY-NEAR MCLEOD PHYSICIAN ASSOCIATES MH104 1,867 FTE
CITY-NEAR McLeod Physician Associates II 1,386 FTE
NAT-TCR Lincoln Park Assisted Living 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Great Lakes Management GTHI Cottagewood Rochester 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Owensboro 076 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Kimball Railcar Services 8.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hotel Current 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Charles Schillinger Co 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Olympic Systems Corporation 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gremp Steel Company 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.