Coating metals and metal products for the trade · Texas

Linde Advance Materials Technologies, Inc

Houston, TX · ~22 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Linde Advance Materials Technologies, Inc runs at 66% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Coating metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade B.

Linde Advance Materials Technologies, Inc: 2.2 TCR = 66% of Coating metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Linde Advance Materials Technologies, Inc safety composite

Linde Advance Materials Technologies, Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.3

2023→2024

Linde Advance Materials Technologies, Inc injury rate improved

Linde Advance Materials Technologies, Inc's TCR fell 4.3 from 4.3 in 2023 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=4.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332812 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 66% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #27/69
  • PHOTO QuantumClean-Rooseve…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: QuantumClean-Roosevelt Street (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Linde Advance Materials Technologies, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Linde Advance Materials Technologies, Inc averages 2.2 TCR (66% of the Coating metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Linde Advance Materials Technologies, Inc TCR series: 2023=4.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Linde Advance Materials Technologies, Inc falls in its industry

646 Coating metals and metal produ establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 69 Coating metals and metal produ employers in Texas.

Linde Advance Materials Technologies, Inc (22 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Linde Advance Materials Technologies, Inc
Linde Advance Materials Technologies, Inc (22 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Linde Advance Materials Technologies, Inc has fewer employees than the Coating metals and metal products for th median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.3 4.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332812 · TX · Houston

646 Coating metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR QuantumClean-Roosevelt Street 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ernest-Spencer Custom Coatings 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bham 2 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chromalloy Middletown 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Matador Ranch 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wheeler Land & Livestock, LLC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Diamond B Feedyard, LLC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Luckey Custom Feedlot, Inc. 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Classic 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR La Vergne, TN - 370 New Sanford Rd 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Transport Service 60920 - OUC 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR APL_Lawrenceville. 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Springfield - Install 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE McAlester 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Home City Ice Company Huntsville 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE HydroSolutions of Duluth Inc. 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.