Etching metals and metal products (except printing plates) for the trade · Arizona

QuantumClean-Roosevelt Street

Phoenix, AZ · ~70 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

QuantumClean-Roosevelt Street runs at 66% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Etching metals and metal products (except printing plates) for the trade workplace, earning a grade B.

QuantumClean-Roosevelt Street: 2.2 TCR = 66% of Etching metals and metal products (except printing plates) for the trade BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

QuantumClean-Roosevelt Street safety composite

QuantumClean-Roosevelt Street scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2016→2020

QuantumClean-Roosevelt Street injury rate improved

QuantumClean-Roosevelt Street's TCR fell 2.0 from 2.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.8 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.0 · 2017=2.9 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332812 · Phoenix, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 66% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO Linde Advance Materi…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~70 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Linde Advance Materials Technologies, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

QuantumClean-Roosevelt Street in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows QuantumClean-Roosevelt Street averages 2.2 TCR (66% of the Etching metals and metal products (except printing plates) for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

QuantumClean-Roosevelt Street TCR series: 2016=2 · 2017=2.9 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.3

Where QuantumClean-Roosevelt Street falls in its industry

646 Etching metals and metal produ establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Etching metals and metal produ employers in Arizona.

QuantumClean-Roosevelt Street (70 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate QuantumClean-Roosevelt Street
QuantumClean-Roosevelt Street (70 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

QuantumClean-Roosevelt Street has more employees than the Etching metals and metal products (excep median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2018 4.8 4.8 3 0 0
2017 2.9 1.5 2 0 0
2016 2.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332812 · AZ · Phoenix

646 Etching metals and metal products (except printing plates) for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Linde Advance Materials Technologies, Inc 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR QuantumClean - Carrollton 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wolkerstorfer Co., Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ernest-Spencer Custom Coatings 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Holbrook 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phoenix Office 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mirabella 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Porter Brothers 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR Patewood Outpt Ctr/Med Offices 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Amh 555 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Kendall Electric - PGRA 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Kendall Electric - PBAT 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Republic Services of Little Rock 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE FRHC - Tri-Cities 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Big Rapids Hotel Group, LLC. 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boyer's Food Markets -Birdsboro 70 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.