Gases, industrial (i.e., compressed, liquefied, solid), manufacturing · Oregon

Linde - Medford (Electronics)

White City, OR · ~67 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Linde - Medford (Electronics) runs at 31% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Gases, industrial (i.e., compressed, liquefied, solid), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Linde - Medford (Electronics): 1.0 TCR = 31% of Gases, industrial (i.e., compressed, liquefied, solid), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Linde - Medford (Electronics) safety composite

Linde - Medford (Electronics) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Linde - Medford (Electronics): 0.0 → 1.2 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 2.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.2× in 2024

Linde - Medford (Electronics)'s TCR rose 1.2 from 0.0 in 2020 to 1.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325120 · White City, OR AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 31% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #2/4
  • PHOTO Neosho
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~67 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Neosho (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Linde - Medford (Electronics) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Linde - Medford (Electronics) averages 1.0 TCR (31% of the Gases, industrial (i.e., compressed, liquefied, solid), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Linde - Medford (Electronics) TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=1.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Linde - Medford (Electronics) falls in its industry

295 Gases, industrial (i.e., compr establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 4 Gases, industrial (i.e., compr employers in Oregon.

Linde - Medford (Electronics) (67 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100120 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Linde - Medford (Electronics)
Linde - Medford (Electronics) (67 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Linde - Medford (Electronics) has more employees than the Gases, industrial (i.e., compressed, liq median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2023 2.9 1.4 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325120 · OR · White City

295 Gases, industrial (i.e., compressed, liquefied, solid), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 57 employers in White City, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Neosho 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Linde - Terrell 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Praxair GBR 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Linde - HYCO Clear Lake 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Van Essen Nursery Company Inc 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cascade Fruit Growers 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lomakatsi Restoration Project 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Consumers Power, Inc 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR-Medford 4,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSH Oregon Site 285 FTE
CITY-NEAR Croman Corp 187 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cascade Wood Products, Inc. 140 FTE
NAT-TCR Dassault Falcon Jet LIT 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR White Marsh Training Center 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Madison 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Advanced Industrial Services LLC - Columbus 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Commonwealth Senior Living at The West End 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amcon - Crossville 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE CMC Rebar Lawrenceville 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mississippi-Tennessee Transformers, Inc. 67 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.