Ambulance and fire service combined · Illinois

Lisle-Woodridge Fire Protection District

Lisle, IL · ~91 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.2
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lisle-Woodridge Fire Protection District runs at 256% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Ambulance and fire service combined workplace, earning a grade F.

Lisle-Woodridge Fire Protection District: 8.2 TCR = 256% of Ambulance and fire service combined BLS 3.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lisle-Woodridge Fire Protection District safety composite

Lisle-Woodridge Fire Protection District scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 8.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Lisle-Woodridge Fire Protection District: 4.4 → 14.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 14.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.44× in 2024

Lisle-Woodridge Fire Protection District's TCR rose 10.0 from 4.4 in 2020 to 14.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922160 · Lisle, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.2 · 256% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #101/262
  • PHOTO 00001300 1300 - FIRE…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 44 inj
  • SIZE ~91 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 00001300 1300 - FIRE SERVICES DIVISION (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Lisle-Woodridge Fire Protection District in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lisle-Woodridge Fire Protection District averages 8.2 TCR (256% of the Ambulance and fire service combined BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lisle-Woodridge Fire Protection District TCR series: 2020=4.4 · 2021=6.8 · 2022=5.3 · 2023=10.1 · 2024=14.4 · BLS 3.2

Where Lisle-Woodridge Fire Protection District falls in its industry

793 Ambulance and fire service com establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 9.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #101 safest of 262 Ambulance and fire service com employers in Illinois.

Lisle-Woodridge Fire Protection District (91 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 9.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Lisle-Woodridge Fire Protection District
Lisle-Woodridge Fire Protection District (91 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 9.8

Lisle-Woodridge Fire Protection District has more employees than the Ambulance and fire service combined median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 9.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 14.4 3.6 13 7 0
2023 10.1 4.6 11 0 0
2022 5.3 3.5 5 1 0
2021 6.8 3.0 9 0 0
2020 4.4 2.2 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922160 · IL · Lisle

793 Ambulance and fire service combined employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 67 employers in Lisle, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 00001300 1300 - FIRE SERVICES DIVISION 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR CITY OF ELDORADO FIRE DEPARTMENT 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coal City Fire Protection District Station #2 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fairview Caseyville Township Fire Protection District 8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Havana Power Station 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dynamic Utility Solutions 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Campus Communications Group 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE MS - East Peroria, IL - 1EPI2 91 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate Office 2,414 FTE
CITY-NEAR Navistar Inc. Lisle WHQ 1,949 FTE
CITY-NEAR Molex, LLC Lisle 1,101 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DCH3 973 FTE
NAT-TCR Main Office 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Chisler Brothers Contracting LLC 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Blazer Boats 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Wysocki Electric Inc 8.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE HERAEUS MEDICAL COMPONENTS - Fridley, MN 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE FXI, Inc. - Cornelius 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE LaCombe - 64490 Highway 434 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Triple-R Electric, Inc. 91 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.