Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard · Georgia

Lithonia Container

Lithonia, GA · ~169 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lithonia Container runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade B.

Lithonia Container: 1.9 TCR = 58% of Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lithonia Container safety composite

Lithonia Container scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2016→2022

Lithonia Container injury rate improved

Lithonia Container's TCR fell 1.5 from 3.0 in 2016 to 1.5 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.0 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=3.0 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Lithonia, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 58% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #28/63
  • PHOTO Hoosier Container, I…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~169 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hoosier Container, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Lithonia Container in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lithonia Container averages 1.9 TCR (58% of the Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lithonia Container TCR series: 2016=3 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=3 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=1.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Lithonia Container falls in its industry

1,338 Corrugated and solid fiber box establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 63 Corrugated and solid fiber box employers in Georgia.

Lithonia Container (169 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate Lithonia Container
Lithonia Container (169 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Lithonia Container has more employees than the Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made fr median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.5 0.5 3 0 0
2021 1.6 0.5 3 0 0
2020 1.5 0.5 3 0 0
2019 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2018 3.0 1.5 5 1 0
2017 2.3 0.6 2 2 0
2016 3.0 2.4 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · GA · Lithonia

1,338 Corrugated and solid fiber boxes made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 77 employers in Lithonia, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hoosier Container, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Magnolia Container 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Paper Biglerville Container 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Paper Fort Smith South 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mascot Pecan Shelling 169 FTE
STATE-SIZE Standard Textile, Thomaston 169 FTE
STATE-SIZE Interfor US Inc - Perry Division 169 FTE
STATE-SIZE QSR, a Datwyler company 169 FTE
CITY-NEAR Emory Hillandale Hospital - EHC 787 FTE
CITY-NEAR Home Chef - Atlanta GA 704 FTE
CITY-NEAR T&J Industries Development and Contracting, Inc 651 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dart Container Lithonia 479 FTE
NAT-TCR Betz Pattern 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Honeywell Platteville Site 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Simon Roofing and Sheet Metal Corp - Columbus- 002 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Waring 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE CWS-ODFL 169 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lunds & Byerlys, Eagan 169 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bellavance Beverage Company 169 FTE
NAT-SIZE Childrens Hospital - Fox Valley 169 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.