Cups, polystyrene foam, manufacturing · Georgia

Dart Container Lithonia

Lithonia, GA · ~479 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dart Container Lithonia runs at 55% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Cups, polystyrene foam, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Dart Container Lithonia: 1.8 TCR = 55% of Cups, polystyrene foam, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dart Container Lithonia safety composite

Dart Container Lithonia scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.0

2016→2024

Dart Container Lithonia injury rate improved

Dart Container Lithonia's TCR fell 5.0 from 5.8 in 2016 to 0.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.11× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.8 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=3.0 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=0.2 · 2023=0.2 · 2024=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326140 · Lithonia, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 55% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #8/20
  • PHOTO Dart Container Quitman
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 83 inj
  • SIZE ~479 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dart Container Quitman (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Dart Container Lithonia in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dart Container Lithonia averages 1.8 TCR (55% of the Cups, polystyrene foam, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dart Container Lithonia TCR series: 2016=5.8 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=3 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=0.2 · 2023=0.2 · 2024=0.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Dart Container Lithonia falls in its industry

260 Cups, polystyrene foam, manufa establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 20 Cups, polystyrene foam, manufa employers in Georgia.

Dart Container Lithonia (479 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Dart Container Lithonia
Dart Container Lithonia (479 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Dart Container Lithonia has more employees than the Cups, polystyrene foam, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.8 0.2 4 0 0
2023 0.2 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.2 0.2 1 0 0
2021 0.8 0.5 3 0 0
2020 0.9 0.7 4 0 0
2019 3.0 2.2 15 0 0
2018 2.1 1.9 12 0 0
2017 2.4 1.9 14 0 0
2016 5.8 4.6 29 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326140 · GA · Lithonia

260 Cups, polystyrene foam, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 77 employers in Lithonia, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dart Container Quitman 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lifoam North Andover 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dart Container Lancaster 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3A Composites USA - Glasgow 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE U Tec Construction Inc 479 FTE
STATE-SIZE GC8 Industrial Dr, Gold Creek Processing, LLC. 479 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Westin Peachtree Plaza 479 FTE
STATE-SIZE NGDS-D612 478 FTE
CITY-NEAR Emory Hillandale Hospital - EHC 787 FTE
CITY-NEAR Home Chef - Atlanta GA 704 FTE
CITY-NEAR T&J Industries Development and Contracting, Inc 651 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1340 354 FTE
NAT-TCR Thermo Fishr Scientific 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Electrical Corporation of America, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Zeus Aiken 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Gunther Motor Company of Plantation, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Plastipak- Champaign 479 FTE
NAT-SIZE San Antonio 479 FTE
NAT-SIZE Driver Pipeline Company, Inc. - Corporate 479 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bethany on University 479 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.