Vegetable sorting, grading, and packing · California

Live Oak Farms

Le Grand, CA · ~315 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Live Oak Farms runs at 164% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Vegetable sorting, grading, and packing workplace, earning a grade D.

Live Oak Farms: 7.4 TCR = 164% of Vegetable sorting, grading, and packing BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Live Oak Farms safety composite

Live Oak Farms scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Live Oak Farms: 6.1 → 7.3 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 9.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.5× in 2024

Live Oak Farms's TCR rose 1.2 from 6.1 in 2017 to 7.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 9.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 115114 · Le Grand, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 7.4 · 164% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK #161/236
  • PHOTO L&M Warehouse & Pack…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 85 inj
  • SIZE ~315 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: L&M Warehouse & Packing of South Florida, LLC-Labelle (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Live Oak Farms in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Live Oak Farms averages 7.4 TCR (164% of the Vegetable sorting, grading, and packing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Live Oak Farms TCR series: 2017=6.1 · 2018=9.3 · 2019=7.4 · 2020=9.4 · 2021=7.2 · 2022=8.2 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=7.3 · BLS 4.5

Where Live Oak Farms falls in its industry

666 Vegetable sorting, grading, an establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #161 safest of 236 Vegetable sorting, grading, an employers in California.

Live Oak Farms (315 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Live Oak Farms
Live Oak Farms (315 employees, TCR 7.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Live Oak Farms has more employees than the Vegetable sorting, grading, and packing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.3 3.7 12 0 0
2023 4.1 2.7 6 0 0
2022 8.2 6.6 10 0 0
2021 7.2 5.2 10 1 0
2020 9.4 5.7 14 1 0
2019 7.4 5.4 11 0 0
2018 9.3 6.2 13 2 0
2017 6.1 4.8 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

115114 · CA · Le Grand

666 Vegetable sorting, grading, and packing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 5 employers in Le Grand, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR L&M Warehouse & Packing of South Florida, LLC-Labelle 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harris Woolf Almonds Coalinga 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Duckwall-Pooley Fruit Co. 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cecelia Packing Corp 7.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE M&J Farm Labor Contractor, Inc 315 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 313 315 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 308 315 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 314 315 FTE
CITY-NEAR J Marchini Farms 421 FTE
CITY-NEAR MINTURN NUT CO INC 161 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grand View Dairy 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR Double G Farms, L.P. 9 FTE
NAT-TCR Suspa, Inc. 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Caregivers of Pleasant Grove, Inc 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Herbruck's of Pennsylvania, LLC 7.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Kalkaska County Road Commission 7.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Trade Port 2 315 FTE
NAT-SIZE Asplundh Tree Expert, LLC - 448 315 FTE
NAT-SIZE Derby Health & Rehab 315 FTE
NAT-SIZE PA - Carlisle Multi-Client 315 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.