Agriculture production or harvesting crews · California

J Marchini Farms

Le Grand, CA · ~421 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

J Marchini Farms runs at 21% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Agriculture production or harvesting crews workplace, earning a grade A.

J Marchini Farms: 0.9 TCR = 21% of Agriculture production or harvesting crews BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

J Marchini Farms safety composite

J Marchini Farms scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2017→2024

J Marchini Farms injury rate improved

J Marchini Farms's TCR fell 1.8 from 2.4 in 2017 to 0.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.4 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=0.7 · 2021=0.7 · 2022=0.2 · 2023=0.6 · 2024=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 115115 · Le Grand, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 21% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #58/620
  • PHOTO Gutierrez Contracting
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~421 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gutierrez Contracting (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

J Marchini Farms in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows J Marchini Farms averages 0.9 TCR (21% of the Agriculture production or harvesting crews BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

J Marchini Farms TCR series: 2017=2.4 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=0.7 · 2021=0.7 · 2022=0.2 · 2023=0.6 · 2024=0.6 · BLS 4.5

Where J Marchini Farms falls in its industry

836 Agriculture production or harv establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #58 safest of 620 Agriculture production or harv employers in California.

J Marchini Farms (421 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate J Marchini Farms
J Marchini Farms (421 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 107 employees and a TCR of 4.4

J Marchini Farms has more employees than the Agriculture production or harvesting cre median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.6 0.6 2 0 0
2023 0.6 0.6 2 0 0
2022 0.2 0.2 1 0 0
2021 0.7 0.7 3 0 0
2020 0.7 0.7 3 0 0
2019 1.6 1.2 8 0 0
2018 0.9 0.9 4 0 0
2017 2.4 2.2 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

115115 · CA · Le Grand

836 Agriculture production or harvesting crews employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 5 employers in Le Grand, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gutierrez Contracting 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aaron Ruiz 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR R. MORA FARM LABOR SERVICES, INC 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hillside Farms Farm Labor Contracting, Inc. 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Division 3 421 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Lodge at Torrey Pines 421 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bay Area Housing Authority Risk Mgmt 421 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paris Valley Vineyard Services Company 420 FTE
CITY-NEAR Live Oak Farms 315 FTE
CITY-NEAR MINTURN NUT CO INC 161 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grand View Dairy 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR Double G Farms, L.P. 9 FTE
NAT-TCR Swimwear Anywhere, Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Indiana University Health, Inc 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Bluffton Office 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Menasha Packaging Company - Columbus 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mondi 421 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trinity Plastics Inc. 421 FTE
NAT-SIZE Park Ridge Park District 421 FTE
NAT-SIZE United Helpers Canton Nursing Home, Inc. dba Maplewood Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 421 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.