Waste collection services, nonhazardous solid · California

Livermore Sanitation Incorporation

Livermore, CA · ~79 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.7
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Livermore Sanitation Incorporation runs at 333% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Waste collection services, nonhazardous solid workplace, earning a grade F.

Livermore Sanitation Incorporation: 8.7 TCR = 333% of Waste collection services, nonhazardous solid BLS 2.6 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Livermore Sanitation Incorporation safety composite

Livermore Sanitation Incorporation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.9

2017→2022

Livermore Sanitation Incorporation injury rate improved

Livermore Sanitation Incorporation's TCR fell 5.9 from 14.3 in 2017 to 8.4 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 14.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=14.3 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=8.3 · 2020=10.7 · 2021=7.9 · 2022=8.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · Livermore, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.7 · 333% of ind

  • DART 6.0 DART
  • RANK #159/247
  • PHOTO S02960 - Long Beach …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 48 inj
  • SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: S02960 - Long Beach Hauling (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Livermore Sanitation Incorporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Livermore Sanitation Incorporation averages 8.7 TCR (333% of the Waste collection services, nonhazardous solid BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Livermore Sanitation Incorporation TCR series: 2017=14.3 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=8.3 · 2020=10.7 · 2021=7.9 · 2022=8.4 · BLS 2.6

Where Livermore Sanitation Incorporation falls in its industry

2,322 Waste collection services, non establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #159 safest of 247 Waste collection services, non employers in California.

Livermore Sanitation Incorporation (79 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Livermore Sanitation Incorporation
Livermore Sanitation Incorporation (79 employees, TCR 8.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Livermore Sanitation Incorporation has more employees than the Waste collection services, nonhazardous median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 8.4 6.0 7 0 0
2021 7.9 5.1 14 0 0
2020 10.7 9.2 7 0 0
2019 8.3 4.8 7 0 0
2018 2.3 1.1 2 0 0
2017 14.3 11.7 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · CA · Livermore

2,322 Waste collection services, nonhazardous solid employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 296 employers in Livermore, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR S02960 - Long Beach Hauling 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Guaynabo Recycling 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR AVW Kearneysville 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR S11114 - South Bend Transport 8.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Crisalida Berry Farms, LLC 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE L E Cooke Co 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE MOBI'S 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Maricopa 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR Retail Merchandising Solutions, LLC 4,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 577 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gillig LLC 940 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fat Chance Entertainment 917 FTE
NAT-TCR 314885-Las-Crossroads Sta 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 316201-Nor-Meadow Mesa Sta 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 564984-Mad-Middleton Br 8.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 124312-Hinesville Po 8.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Always There Staffing Grand Rapids MN 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE MedVet Northern Utah 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE MedVet Pittsburgh 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE MedVet Mandeville 79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.