Temporary staffing services · Minnesota

Always There Staffing Grand Rapids MN

Grand Rapids, MN · ~79 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.9
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Always There Staffing Grand Rapids MN runs at 613% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Temporary staffing services workplace, earning a grade F.

Always There Staffing Grand Rapids MN: 15.9 TCR = 613% of Temporary staffing services BLS 2.6 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Always There Staffing Grand Rapids MN safety composite

Always There Staffing Grand Rapids MN scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 17.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.8

2018→2022

Always There Staffing Grand Rapids MN injury rate improved

Always There Staffing Grand Rapids MN's TCR fell 5.8 from 26.8 in 2018 to 21.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 26.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=26.8 · 2019=8.7 · 2020=11.7 · 2021=11.5 · 2022=21.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561320 · Grand Rapids, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.9 · 613% of ind

  • DART 17.5 DART
  • RANK #18/19
  • PHOTO Employbridge/Walmart
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Employbridge/Walmart (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Always There Staffing Grand Rapids MN in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Always There Staffing Grand Rapids MN averages 15.9 TCR (613% of the Temporary staffing services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Always There Staffing Grand Rapids MN TCR series: 2018=26.8 · 2019=8.7 · 2020=11.7 · 2021=11.5 · 2022=21 · BLS 2.6

Where Always There Staffing Grand Rapids MN falls in its industry

652 Temporary staffing services establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 19 Temporary staffing services employers in Minnesota.

Always There Staffing Grand Rapids MN (79 employees, TCR 15.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 197 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Always There Staffing Grand Rapids MN
Always There Staffing Grand Rapids MN (79 employees, TCR 15.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 197 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Always There Staffing Grand Rapids MN has fewer employees than the Temporary staffing services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 21.0 17.5 6 0 0
2021 11.5 11.5 4 0 0
2020 11.7 11.7 4 0 0
2019 8.7 8.7 3 0 0
2018 26.8 19.1 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561320 · MN · Grand Rapids

652 Temporary staffing services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 75 employers in Grand Rapids, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Employbridge/Walmart 15.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vforce Inc 16.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Personnel Plus, Inc. Boise 16.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sacramento Field Office 15.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Elcor Construction 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE ALLSTATES PAVEMENT RECYCLING & STABILIZATION, INC 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sir Lines A-Lot 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE USI (Hastings, MN) 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grand Itasca Clinic & Hospital 706 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grand Itasca Clniic & Hospital 665 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1609 304 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1609 301 FTE
NAT-TCR 252790-Eaton Rapids Po 15.9 TCR
NAT-TCR The Home City Ice Company - Chicago - 170 15.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 639 Swn62 15.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Avamere sherwood Operations LLC 15.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Livermore Sanitation Incorporation 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE MedVet Northern Utah 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE MedVet Pittsburgh 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE MedVet Mandeville 79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.