Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Michigan

Living Joy Assisted Living

Flushing, MI · ~20 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Living Joy Assisted Living runs at 131% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Living Joy Assisted Living: 5.0 TCR = 131% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Living Joy Assisted Living safety composite

Living Joy Assisted Living scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.2

2018→2020

Living Joy Assisted Living injury rate improved

Living Joy Assisted Living's TCR fell 8.2 from 8.2 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.2 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=8.2 · 2019=6.7 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Flushing, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.0 · 131% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #75/201
  • PHOTO The Harbor at Renais…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Harbor at Renaissance (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Living Joy Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Living Joy Assisted Living averages 5.0 TCR (131% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Living Joy Assisted Living TCR series: 2018=8.2 · 2019=6.7 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Living Joy Assisted Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #75 safest of 201 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Michigan.

Living Joy Assisted Living (20 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Living Joy Assisted Living
Living Joy Assisted Living (20 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Living Joy Assisted Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 6.7 6.7 1 0 0
2018 8.2 8.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MI · Flushing

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 19 employers in Flushing, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Harbor at Renaissance 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hanover Operations, LLC 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grandview Chisholm Trail, LLC 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 60093 SUNRISE OF FAIRFIELD 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tholrund Brothers 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Indeck Niles Energy Center 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michigan Solar Solutions West 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE WTB Tuscola Bay Wind Plant 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ultra-Dex, LLC 545 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fessler & Bowman 541 FTE
CITY-NEAR Heartland Health Care Center - Fostrian 177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Heartland Health Care Center Fostrian 160 FTE
NAT-TCR IMI Material Handling Logistics Inc. 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Recycling Industries Inc 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Andersons Clymers Ethanol LLC 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR NGA West 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Aumund Corporation 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vantage Pointe 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Western Specialty Contractors - Branch 025 - Chicago, IL 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Logistics Yard 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.