Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Virginia

The Harbor at Renaissance

Stanardsville, VA · ~47 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Harbor at Renaissance runs at 131% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

The Harbor at Renaissance: 5.0 TCR = 131% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Harbor at Renaissance safety composite

The Harbor at Renaissance scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−18.2

2016→2024

The Harbor at Renaissance injury rate improved

The Harbor at Renaissance's TCR fell 18.2 from 20.8 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 20.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=20.8 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=7.0 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Stanardsville, VA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.0 · 131% of ind

  • DART 2.6 DART
  • RANK #59/199
  • PHOTO Living Joy Assisted …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Living Joy Assisted Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

The Harbor at Renaissance in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Harbor at Renaissance averages 5.0 TCR (131% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Harbor at Renaissance TCR series: 2016=20.8 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=7 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 3.8

Where The Harbor at Renaissance falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #59 safest of 199 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Virginia.

The Harbor at Renaissance (47 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Harbor at Renaissance
The Harbor at Renaissance (47 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Harbor at Renaissance has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.3 2.1 2 0 0
2019 7.0 4.7 2 1 0
2018 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2016 20.8 7.8 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · VA · Stanardsville

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Living Joy Assisted Living 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hanover Operations, LLC 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grandview Chisholm Trail, LLC 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 60093 SUNRISE OF FAIRFIELD 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE BATH CO PW ST 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE RCL 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Heritage Contracting LLC 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE TRINITY Group Construction 47 FTE
NAT-TCR 230020 - Troy Store 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Thermo King of Atlanta 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR The M&R Companies 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Landscapes USA - SD 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Patrick Lynch Elementary 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE DeSales Community Housing Corporation 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Pacific Plastic Fabricators, Inc 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rudolph's Inc. 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.