Delicatessens primarily retailing a range of grocery items and meats · Texas

Lmmm Houston #65, Ltd

Spring, TX · ~21 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.2
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lmmm Houston #65, Ltd runs at 272% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Delicatessens primarily retailing a range of grocery items and meats workplace, earning a grade F.

Lmmm Houston #65, Ltd: 9.2 TCR = 272% of Delicatessens primarily retailing a range of grocery items and meats BLS 3.4 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lmmm Houston #65, Ltd safety composite

Lmmm Houston #65, Ltd scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2019→2022

Lmmm Houston #65, Ltd injury rate improved

Lmmm Houston #65, Ltd's TCR fell 1.9 from 11.3 in 2019 to 9.4 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 11.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.02× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=11.3 · 2020=6.4 · 2021=9.8 · 2022=9.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 445110 · Spring, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.2 · 272% of ind

  • DART 9.4 DART
  • RANK #1702/1899
  • PHOTO 10782 Chattanooga East
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 10782 Chattanooga East (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Lmmm Houston #65, Ltd in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lmmm Houston #65, Ltd averages 9.2 TCR (272% of the Delicatessens primarily retailing a range of grocery items and meats BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lmmm Houston #65, Ltd TCR series: 2019=11.3 · 2020=6.4 · 2021=9.8 · 2022=9.4 · BLS 3.4

Where Lmmm Houston #65, Ltd falls in its industry

30,654 Delicatessens primarily retail establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1702 safest of 1899 Delicatessens primarily retail employers in Texas.

Lmmm Houston #65, Ltd (21 employees, TCR 9.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Lmmm Houston #65, Ltd
Lmmm Houston #65, Ltd (21 employees, TCR 9.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Lmmm Houston #65, Ltd has fewer employees than the Delicatessens primarily retailing a rang median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 9.4 9.4 2 0 0
2021 9.8 4.9 2 0 0
2020 6.4 6.4 1 0 0
2019 11.3 11.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

445110 · TX · Spring

30,654 Delicatessens primarily retailing a range of grocery items and meats employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 212 employers in Spring, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 10782 Chattanooga East 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tolland 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 703-00645 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR SWY-0025-0025-03031 FAC-03031-DALY CITY-CA 9.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Grass Roots Farming LLC. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dawn Cattle Feeders 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Twin Lakes Dairy LP 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE SEABOARD FOODS LP TEXAS MAINT 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Exxon Mobil Corporation Houston Campus 5,480 FTE
CITY-NEAR HP Inc. Houston 2,348 FTE
CITY-NEAR ExxonMobil Global Services Company Houston Campus 2,050 FTE
CITY-NEAR American Bureau of Shipping 1,159 FTE
NAT-TCR 205 Stapelton 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Movin' On Movers 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Community Convalescent Hospital of La Mesa DBA Community Care Center 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Red Lion Port Angeles 9.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cockerham Dispatch Office 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE McCormick Sand Inc 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pat's Heating & A/C, Inc. 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alleghany Investments LLC 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.