Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Lo-Har Senior Living

El Cajon, CA · ~28 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lo-Har Senior Living runs at 238% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Lo-Har Senior Living: 9.0 TCR = 238% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lo-Har Senior Living safety composite

Lo-Har Senior Living scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 9.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.2

2017→2022

Lo-Har Senior Living injury rate improved

Lo-Har Senior Living's TCR fell 11.2 from 15.3 in 2017 to 4.1 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 55.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=15.3 · 2018=11.3 · 2019=7.2 · 2020=7.2 · 2021=55.4 · 2022=4.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · El Cajon, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.0 · 238% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #309/635
  • PHOTO New Horizon Lodge
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: New Horizon Lodge (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Lo-Har Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lo-Har Senior Living averages 9.0 TCR (238% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lo-Har Senior Living TCR series: 2017=15.3 · 2018=11.3 · 2019=7.2 · 2020=7.2 · 2021=55.4 · 2022=4.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Lo-Har Senior Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #309 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Lo-Har Senior Living (28 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Lo-Har Senior Living
Lo-Har Senior Living (28 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Lo-Har Senior Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.1 0.0 1 0 0
2021 55.4 55.4 1 12 0
2020 7.2 7.2 2 0 0
2019 7.2 7.2 2 0 0
2018 11.3 11.3 3 0 0
2017 15.3 15.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · El Cajon

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 236 employers in El Cajon, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR New Horizon Lodge 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dardenne Prairie MC Care Properties, LLC 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brentwood at Fore Ranch 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ivy Park at Sabre Springs 9.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Davis Ranch L.L.C. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Steinbeck Country Produce 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harlan Family Ranch 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE KKG Equipment Company, LLC32 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR SOUTHERN REGION : SDU 1,176 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 370 1,148 FTE
CITY-NEAR GKN Aerospace Chem-tronics 1,059 FTE
CITY-NEAR GKN Aerospace Chem Tronics 938 FTE
NAT-TCR Lyman Roofing & Siding 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Egelston Township 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Winona Foods Inc. - Brookfield 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Doctors Hospital 9.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Oak Grove Elementary School 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE 7031 - 1-Matamoros #1 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE FNG-Saline 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE buybuy Baby Chandler 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.