Lumber, Plywood, Millwork, and Wood Panel Merchant Wholesalers · Minnesota

Lyman Roofing & Siding

St. Louis Park, MN · ~91 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.0
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lyman Roofing & Siding runs at 411% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Lumber, Plywood, Millwork, and Wood Panel Merchant Wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Lyman Roofing & Siding: 9.0 TCR = 411% of Lumber, Plywood, Millwork, and Wood Panel Merchant Wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lyman Roofing & Siding safety composite

Lyman Roofing & Siding scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.9

2017→2022

Lyman Roofing & Siding injury rate improved

Lyman Roofing & Siding's TCR fell 4.9 from 9.4 in 2017 to 4.5 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 16.6 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.4 · 2018=16.6 · 2019=5.3 · 2020=13.1 · 2021=5.4 · 2022=4.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423310 · St. Louis Park, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.0 · 411% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #18/28
  • PHOTO 8153 DULUTH DIST CEN…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 44 inj
  • SIZE ~91 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 8153 DULUTH DIST CENTER MILLWORK GA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Lyman Roofing & Siding in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lyman Roofing & Siding averages 9.0 TCR (411% of the Lumber, Plywood, Millwork, and Wood Panel Merchant Wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lyman Roofing & Siding TCR series: 2017=9.4 · 2018=16.6 · 2019=5.3 · 2020=13.1 · 2021=5.4 · 2022=4.5 · BLS 2.2

Where Lyman Roofing & Siding falls in its industry

1,225 Lumber, Plywood, Millwork, and establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 28 Lumber, Plywood, Millwork, and employers in Minnesota.

Lyman Roofing & Siding (91 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100120 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Lyman Roofing & Siding
Lyman Roofing & Siding (91 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Lyman Roofing & Siding has more employees than the Lumber, Plywood, Millwork, and Wood Pane median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.5 3.4 4 0 0
2021 5.4 4.3 5 0 0
2020 13.1 13.1 8 4 0
2019 5.3 5.3 5 0 0
2018 16.6 14.4 15 0 0
2017 9.4 8.0 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423310 · MN · St. Louis Park

1,225 Lumber, Plywood, Millwork, and Wood Panel Merchant Wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 63 employers in St. Louis Park, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 8153 DULUTH DIST CENTER MILLWORK GA 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 5801 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rocky Top Knoxville 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR OrePac Building Products - Ontario 9.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bushel Boy Farms, LLP 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Interstate Improvement, Inc. 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE RJ Mechanical Inc 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harty Mechanical 91 FTE
CITY-NEAR Japs Olson - St Louis Park 670 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of St. Louis Park 431 FTE
CITY-NEAR Swanson & Youngdale, Inc. 322 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lunds & Byerlys, St. Louis Park 262 FTE
NAT-TCR Lo-Har Senior Living 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Egelston Township 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Winona Foods Inc. - Brookfield 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Doctors Hospital 9.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE BERRYSTNC 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Jones Farm 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZDBQ 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZEHO 91 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.